Use of supervised machine learning algorithms in predicting postoperative mortality in gastrointestinal and HPB surgeries.
VASAVADA, B.; vasavada, a. n.
Show abstract
Aim of the studyThis study aims to evaluate supervised machine learning algorithms in predicting 90 days post-operative mortality in gastrointestinal and HPB surgeries and comparing them with standard logistic regression methods. MethodsWe evaluated various supervised machine learning classification algorithms like gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbours, random forest, and support vector machines with standard logistic regression methods. We used accuracy and the Receiver operating curve to compare the methods. 60% of the data were used for training, 20% for validation and 20% for testing. We used JASP 0.16.04 by the University of Amsterdam to run machine learning algorithms and statistical analysis. ResultsWe used data from 504 patients who have undergone gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatic biliary surgery between April 2016 and March 2023. We analyzed algorithms for predicting 90 days post-operative mortality based on features like Major surgeries, Surgeries for malignancies, age, CDC grade of surgeries, Intraoperative hypotension, Open vs Laparoscopic surgeries, ASA grade, Emergency surgeries, Operative time, Intraoperative blood product used, colorectal surgeries, small intestinal surgeries, HPB surgeries, upper gastrointestinal surgeries and hernia. Test accuracies were 96% for gradient boosting, 90 % for K-nearest neighbours, 96% for the random forest, 94% for support vector and Areas under the ROC curve were 0.802 for gradient boosting, 0.489 for K-nearest neighbours, 0.934 for random forest and 0.5 for support vector algorithms. Accuracy and Area under the ROC curve with standard logistic regression method were 94% and 0.757. Features of importance in decreasing order were ASA, operative times, blood products, small bowel surgeries and Age. ConclusionSupervised machine learning algorithms particularly gradient boosting and random forest predicted 90 days post-operative mortality more accurately than logistic regression and such models can be part of the preoperative evaluation in gastrointestinal and HPB surgeries.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 96%
- REPLICCAR II Study: Data Quality Audit in the Paulista Cardiovascular Surgery Registry 95%
- Postoperative mortality analysis of national Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database with a focus on regional comparisons and changes over time 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of high-risk liver cancer patients from their mutation profile: Benchmarking of mutation calling techniques 95%
- Enhanced Formulation of Precision Probiotics through Active Machine Learning 89%
- Aspirin Use is Associated with Decreased Mortality in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improvement of Survival Outcomes of Cholangiocarcinoma by Ultrasonography Surveillance: Multicenter Retrospective Cohorts 94%
- Perceptions of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine: Insights from a Large-Scale International Cross-Sectional Survey of Surgery Researchers and Clinicians 92%
- Influence of body mass index on SAPS3 prognostic performance in critically ill patients from Brazil 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis Based on National Survey Data 93%
- Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases among Bangladeshi Adults: An Application of Generalized Linear Mixed Model on Multilevel Demographic and Health Survey Data 93%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.