Back

Blood clot resolution using active fluid exchange in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage

Haldrup, M.; Jakobsen, A.; Rasmussen, M.; Dyrskog, S.; Simonsen, C.; Groenhoej, M.; Poulsen, F.; Korshoej, A.

2023-07-06 neurology
10.1101/2023.07.04.23292127 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveIntraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a severe condition with poor outcome and high mortality. New treatments are warranted to facilitate clot removal and accelerate recovery of IVH patients. We examined the effect to intraventricular lavage on IVH resolution, clearance and kinectics. The study is a post-hoc study on a recently performed randomized study, where intraventricular lavage using controlled irrigation and aspiration was tested against passive drainage. The present study describe post hoc analysis of the Active Study to determine the effect of intraventricular lavage on IVH resolution clearance and kinetics. MethodpostPost-hoc analysis using data from the multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical safety/feasibility trial (Active Study, NCT05204849) including 21 patients with IVH. IVH clearance was assessed using volume segmentation of serial CT scans. Clot resolution kinetics were determined and correlated with irrigation rates. ResultsThe data set consisted of 77 sequential CT scans from 18 patients (3 of the 21 patients included in the Active study were excluded due to rebleeding or only one CT scan performed). Baseline characteristics were equal in the two groups. Clot resolution followed 0-order kinetics. The clot half-life was 3.9 days in the group treated with intraventricular lavage compared to 5.3 days in the control group treated with passive drainage (p = 0.6). We did not observe accelerated clot resolution in the ventricles containing the catheter tip (3.9 days vs 3.6 days, p = 0.9). In the intervention group, clot resolution was increased by 0.05% per ml increase in irrigation (slope 1.576 ml/cm3 (95%CI 0.55-2.6) p=0.03) ConclusionWe found that IVH clot resolution followed 0-order kinetics. No significant differences in clot half-life were observed between the two groups. However, the clot resolution rate was positively correlated with the irrigation rates.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
3
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
10
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
11
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
14
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
19
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%