Back

Comparison Of Large Subcostal Hernias Treated With Open Anterior Components Separation Or Open Transversus Abdominis Release Techniques

Espinosa-de-los-Monteros, A.; Fernandez-Alva, D.; Solis-Reyna, R. A.; de-la-Garza-Elizondo, C. A.; Vazquez-Guadalupe, J.; Posadas-Trujillo, O. E.; Diaz-Trueba, F. E.

2023-07-12 surgery
10.1101/2023.07.02.23292142 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLarge subcostal incisional hernias are considered as complex defects, and a few different approaches have been described for repair. The purpose of this comparative cross-sectional study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients with large subcostal incisional hernias treated with either the open anterior components separation technique (ACS) or with the open transversus abdominis release technique (TAR). MethodsFrom the database of patients with large complex incisional hernias who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with open techniques between April 2007 and October 2022 at our institution, on May 25th, 2023 we identified those whose hernias were located in the subcostal areas and who underwent reconstruction with a components separation technique and mesh. Perioperative variables and outcomes were compared between the patients with large subcostal hernias who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with either the ACS or the TAR techniques. ResultsThirty-one patients with large subcostal hernias were included in the study. ACS and intra-abdominal mesh was used in 11 patients; TAR and retro-muscular mesh was performed in 20 patients. More postoperative local abdominal wall complications were seen in patients undergoing ACS as opposed to TAR (55% vs 15%, p=0.02). Hernia recurrence was more common in patients undergoing ACS as opposed to TAR (55% vs 5%, p=0.008). ConclusionsMore post-operative complications and recurrences were seen in patients undergoing ACS as opposed to TAR.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.