Back

Appropriate sampling and long follow-up are required to rigorously evaluate longevity of humoral memory after vaccination

Ganusov, V. V.

2023-06-29 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2023.06.28.23291950 medRxiv
Show abstract

One of the goals of vaccination is to induce long-term immunity against the infection and/or disease. However, evaluating the duration of protection following vaccination often requires long-term follow-ups that can conflict with the desire to rapidly publish results. Arunachalam et al. JCI 2023 followed individuals receiving third or fourth dose of mRNA COVID19 vaccines for up to 6 months and in finding that the levels of SARS-CoV2-specific antibodies (Abs) declined with similar rates for the two groups came to the conclusion that additional boosting is unnecessary to prolong immunity to SARS-CoV-2. However, this may be premature conclusion to make. Accordingly, we demonstrate that measuring Ab levels at 3 time points and only for a short (up to 6 month) duration does not allow to accurately and rigorously evaluate the long-term half-life of vaccine-induced Abs. By using the data from a cohort of blood donors followed for several years, we show that after re-vaccination with vaccinia virus (VV), VV-specific Abs decay bi-phasically and even the late decay rate exceeds the true slow loss rate of humoral memory observed years prior to the boosting. We argue that mathematical modeling should be used to better optimize sampling schedules to provide more reliable advice about the duration of humoral immunity after repeated vaccinations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.