Association of Domains of Sedentary Behavior with Cardiovascular Disease Events in The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Mayo, N. L.; Lopez, D. A.; Block, R. C.; Shi, H.; Bertoni, A. G.; Diaz, K. M.; Ding, J.; Post, W. S.; Liu, Y.; Li, D.
Show abstract
Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSSedentary behavior is associated with an increased risk for adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), independent of physical activity status. Little is known about this relationship in an ethnically diverse population. The objective of our study is to assess the effects of leisure time and occupational sedentary behavior on multiple cardiovascular outcomes in a multi-ethnic cohort. MethodsThe Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) includes 2619 Caucasian, 1495 Hispanic, 1891 Black, and 804 Chinese-American adults aged 45-84 years and free of clinical CVD at enrollment, Sedentary behavior was self-reported at baseline. Participants were followed for an average of 13.6 years, and 14 types of cardiovascular outcomes were ascertained. Hazards of each cardiovascular outcome were modeled with adjustment for potential confounders, including physical activity. ResultsEvery one hour per day increase in leisure time sedentary behavior predicts a 6% increase in the adjusted hazards for CVD death (P < 0.05). Every one hour increase in occupational sedentary time predicts a 21% and 20% decrease in the hazard for PVD and other revascularization, respectively (P < 0.05). ConclusionsLeisure time sedentary behavior was associated with increased hazards for CVD death, but occupational sedentary time appears to be protective of peripheral vascular disease and other revascularization. Condensed AbstractSedentary behavior has been consistently associated with an increased risk for adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), independent of physical activity status. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) consists of a racially and ethnically diverse cohort of adults age 45-84, free from CVD at baseline. Greater levels of leisure time sedentary behavior predicted increased hazards for PVD and CVD death after an average follow up of 13.6 years whereas occupational sedentary behaviors predicted reduced PVD. These results underscore the importance of reducing time spent sitting in addition to advocating for meeting physical activity targets across ethnicities.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accumulating Sedentary Time and Physical Activity from Childhood to Adolescence and Cardiac Function in Adolescence 97%
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 94%
- Walking pace optimizes conventional cardiovascular disease risk prediction models among vulnerable subpopulations: a prospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint association of genetic risk and accelerometer-based step count with cardiovascular disease: a UK-Biobank cohort study 92%
- Severe biventricular cardiomyopathy in both current and former long-term users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. 92%
- Association of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Community 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Descriptive epidemiology of cardiorespiratory fitness in UK adults: The Fenland Study 93%
- Polygenic score for physical activity provides odds for multiple common diseases 92%
- Physical activity and posture profile of a South African cohort of middle-aged men and women as determined by integrated hip and thigh accelerometry 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Environment-wide association study (EWAS) on cardiometabolic traits: A systematic assessment of the association of lifestyle variables on a longitudinal setting 93%
- Longitudinal associations between physical activity and other health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: A fixed effects analysis 92%
- Associations of Healthy Lifestyle and Socioeconomic Status with Cognitive Function in U.S. Older Adults 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.