Back

Saliva as an alternative sample type for detection of pneumococcal carriage in young children

Wyllie, A. L.; Rots, N. Y.; Wijmenga-Monsuur, A. J.; van Houten, M. A.; Sanders, E. A. M.; Trzcinski, K.

2023-06-27 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.06.26.23288970 medRxiv
Show abstract

In children, the gold standard for the detection of pneumococcal carriage is conventional culture of a nasopharyngeal swab. Saliva, however, has a history as one of the most sensitive methods for surveillances on pneumococcal colonisation and has recently been shown to improve carriage detection in older age groups. Here, we compared the sensitivity of nasopharyngeal and saliva samples from PCV7-vaccinated 24-month-old children for pneumococcal carriage detection using conventional and molecular diagnostic methods. Nasopharyngeal and saliva samples were collected from 288 24-month-old children during the autumn/winter, 2012/2013. All samples were first processed by conventional diagnostic techniques. Next, DNA extracted from all plate growth was tested by qPCR for the presence of pneumococcal genes piaB and lytA and a subset of serotypes. By culture, 164/288 (57%) nasopharyngeal swabs tested positive for pneumococcus, but detection was not possible from saliva due to abundant polymicrobial growth on culture-plates. Molecular methods increased the number of children pneumococci-positive to 172/288 (60%) when testing culture-enriched saliva and to 212/288 (73%) when testing nasopharyngeal samples. Altogether, by molecular methods 239/288 (83%) infants were positive, with qPCR-based carriage detection of culture-enriched nasopharyngeal swabs significantly detecting more carriers compared to either conventional culture (p<0.001) or qPCR-detection of saliva (p<0.001). However, 27/240 (11%) carriers were positive only in saliva, significantly contributing to the overall number of carriers detected (p<0.01). While testing nasopharyngeal swabs with qPCR proved most sensitive for pneumococcal detection in infants, saliva sampling could be considered as complementary to provide additional information on carriage and serotypes which may not be detected in the nasopharynx and may be particularly useful in longitudinal studies, requiring repeated sampling events.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.9%
5
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
7
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
18
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
20
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
22
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
28
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%