How Healthcare Expenditures Affect COVID-19 Fatality Rate Across European Countries?
Coccia, M.; Benati, I.
Show abstract
The goal of this study is to examine the relationship between healthcare expenditures and health capacity, and variability in COVID-19 case fatality rate between European countries. In particular, the purpose of the present study is to see whether statistical evidence supports the hypothesis that the reduction of COVID-19 fatality, between European countries, can be explained by leveraging health expenditures and if so to form some quantitative analyses and estimates of the relation between health expenditures and COVID-19 fatality rate between countries. The research is based on a sample of European countries and data from various sources, including Eurostat, World Bank, and OECD databases. Results suggest that countries with higher COVID-19 fatality rate in 2020 (when pandemic starts) in comparison to countries with lower COVID-19 fatality had (higher) +50.5% of fatality in 2020, +52.9% in 2022, lower health expenditure as % of GDP -5.5%, health expenditure per capita -34.5%, R&D expenditures in health -30.3%, lower reduction of COVID-19 fatality from 2022-2022 by -57.2 % vs 59.3% of the other group. Results also show a negative association between COVID-19 Fatality in 2022 and Health expenditure as a share of GDP 2020 (r=-0.42, p-value 0.05); COVID-19 Fatality in 2022 and Vaccinations in December 2021 (r=-0.75, p-value 0.01). Difference of COVID-19 Fatality 22-20 has also negative correlation coefficients given by r=-0.48 (p-value 0.05) with Health expenditure as a share of GDP of 2020 and by r=-0.52 (p-value 0.01) with vaccinations in December 2021. Partial correlation, controlling population over 65yo in 2020, confirms previous results. The contribution here expands the knowledge in these research topics by endeavoring to clarify how higher health expenditures improve the preparedness and resilience in crisis management of countries to face unforeseen epidemic or pandemic similar to COVID-19 in society.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Using A Socio-Ecological System (SES) Framework to Explain Factors Influencing Countries’ Success Level in Curbing COVID-19 96%
- The Role of Societal Aspects in the Formation of Official COVID-19 Reports: A Data-Driven Analysis 93%
- How the COVID-19 pandemic is shaping research in Africa: inequalities in scholarly output and collaborations and new opportunities for scientific leadership 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of confirmed and death cases of Covid-19 in Chile through time series techniques: A comparative study 95%
- Understanding mental health trends during COVID-19 pandemic in the United States using network analysis 94%
- Investigating the ‘ Bolsonaro effect ’ on the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic: an empirical analysis of observational data in Brazil 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Yet another lockdown? A large-scale study on people’s unwillingness to be confined during the first 5 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain 93%
- A new, simple method of describing COVID-19 trajectory and dynamics in any country based on Johnson Cumulative Distribution Function fitting 92%
- Several countries in one: a mathematical modeling analysis for COVID-19 in inner Brazil 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.