Back

Protocol Of A Systematic Review And Metaanalysis Of Case-Series And Case-Reports Involving Glucagon In Beta-Blocker Overdose

Aranda-Domene, R.; Esteban-Blanes, A.

2023-06-22 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.06.22.23291720 medRxiv
Show abstract

The utility of glucagon in human myocardium remains controversial. In the past, some articles have reported inotropic and chronotropic effects of glucagon on the heart, but other studies have found no significant effects. The main cardiovascular indication for glucagon is beta-blocker toxicity (BB), which is listed as recommendation IIb in some guidelines on the basis of some experimental studies and case reports. To our knowledge, no systematic review has been published analyzing the outcomes of glucagon in reports of overdose. This study will attempt to incorporate findings from case series and reports to fill the gap on a topic where experimental and comparative studies have already been conducted. A protocol to the development of this work is provided.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Cureus
○ 68 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Biomedicines
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
○ 97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
BMJ Open
● 601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Pharmacology
○ 111 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
7
European Journal of Pharmacology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
○ 140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
Open Heart
● 21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Heart Rhythm
○ 23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
13
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
○ 102 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
15
Clinical and Translational Science
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Journal of Hypertension
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Pediatrics
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Nutrients
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
20
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.4%
21
JMIR Research Protocols
◐ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
The American Journal of Cardiology
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Endocrinology
○ 58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
24
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
Neurocritical Care
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
28
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
29
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
30
Current Developments in Nutrition
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.