Spatial and Temporal Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Genome Evolutionary Patterns
Gupta, S.; Gupta, D.; Bhatnagar, S.
Show abstract
The spread of SARS-CoV-2 virus accompanied by availability of abundant sequence data publicly, provides a window for determining the spatio-temporal patterns of viral evolution in response to vaccination. In this study, SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences were collected from seven countries in the period January 2020-December 2022. The sequences were classified into three phases, namely: pre-vaccination, post-vaccination, and recent period. Comparison was performed between these phases based on parameters like mutation rates, selection pressure (dN/dS ratio), and transition to transversion ratios (Ti/Tv). Similar comparisons were performed among SARS-CoV-2 variants. Statistical significance was tested using Graphpad unpaired t-test. The comparative analysis showed an increase in the percent genomic mutation rates post-vaccination and in recent periods across different countries from the pre-vaccination phase. The dN/dS ratios showed positive selection that increased after vaccination, and the Ti/Tv ratios decreased after vaccination. C[->]U and G[->]U were the most frequent transitions and transversions in all the countries. However, U[->]G was the most frequent transversion in recent period. The Omicron variant had the highest genomic mutation rates, while Delta showed the highest dN/dS ratio. Mutation rates were highest in NSP3, S, N and NSP12b before and increased further after vaccination. NSP4 showed the largest change in mutation rates after vaccination. N, ORF8, ORF3a and ORF10 were under highest positive selection before vaccination. They were overtaken by E, S and NSP1 in the after vaccination as well as recent sequences, with the largest change observed in NSP1. Protein-wise dN/dS ratio was also seen to vary across the different variants. ImportanceIrrespective of the different vaccine technologies used, geographical regions and host genetics, variations in the SARS-CoV-2 genome have maintained similar patterns worldwide. To the best of our knowledge, there exists no other large-scale study of the genomic and protein-wise mutation patterns during the time course of evolution in different countries. Analysing the SARS-CoV-2 evolution patterns in response to spatial, temporal, and biological signals is important for diagnostics, therapeutics, and pharmacovigilance of SARS-CoV-2.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2: Proof of recombination between strains and emergence of possibly more virulent ones 97%
- Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Spike D614G Mutation Reveals Unique SARS-CoV-2 Lineages of B.1.524 and AU.2 in Malaysia 97%
- In silico comparative genomics of SARS-CoV-2 to determine the source and diversity of the pathogen in Bangladesh 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the folding dynamics of NS2B protein of Zika virus 94%
- Microsecond simulations and CD spectroscopy reveals the intrinsically disordered nature of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (residues 1242-1273) in isolation 93%
- OvirusTdb: A Repository of Oncolytic Viruses used in Cancer Treatment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizations of SARS-CoV-2 mutational profile, spike protein stability and viral transmission 97%
- Global variation in the SARS-CoV-2 proteome reveals the mutational hotspots in the drug and vaccine candidates 95%
- Genome based Evolutionary study of SARS-CoV-2 towards the Prediction of Epitope Based Chimeric Vaccine 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mutational spectra of SARS-CoV-2 orf1ab polyprotein and Signature mutations in the United States of America 96%
- Genomics of Post-Vaccination SARS-CoV-2 Infections During the Delta Dominated Second Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, from Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), India 96%
- Genome-based comparison between the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 XBB and its parental lineages 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.