Covid-19 Excess Mortality in China: A Regional Comparison
LIU, L.
Show abstract
Estimates of Covid-19 excess mortality are often considered to reflect the true death toll of the pandemic. As such, information on excess mortality is urgently needed to better understand the impact of the pandemic and prepare for future crises. This study estimated Covid-19 excess mortality at the provincial, regional, and national levels in China and investigated its associated regional disparities. The analyses were based on population and death rates data published by the national and provincial bureaus of statistics in China. The results suggest that excess deaths in China were over 1 million during each year of the pandemic, totaling to over 4 million by the end of 2022, at an excess death rate of 15.4%. This rate was likely comparable to that of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), but higher than the US rate. Striking disparities were discovered among the 31 provinces with excess death rates ranging from negative rates in two eastern provinces to over 30% in three inland provinces. Rates in western China were over twice as high as those in eastern China. Variations with each individual regions were the largest in the central region and the smallest in the Northeast, which was the hardest hit with excess death rate of over 23%. The regional disparities in excess mortality rates seem to reflect pre-existing regional inequalities in socio-economic development in China. Such findings suggest that China has far to go to mitigate regional inequalities, achieve sustainability, and prepare for the next major crises.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship between COVID-19 pandemic and ecological, economic, and social characteristics 93%
- Unequal Benefits: The Effects of Health Insurance Integration on Consumption Inequality in Rural China 93%
- Projecting trends in the disease burden of adult edentulism in China between 2020 and 2030: a systematic study based on the global burden of disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation method of ecosystem service value under complex ecological environment: A case study of Gansu Province, China 93%
- Spatio-temporal evolution of urban thermal environment and its driving factors: Case study of Nanjing, China 93%
- Water Pollution and Administrative Division Adjustments: A Quasi-natural Experiment in Chaohu Lake of China 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A small H2O-soluble ingredient of royal jelly lower cholesterol levels in liver cells by suppressing squalene epoxidase 91%
- Power spectra density and similarity analysis of COVID-19 mortality waves across countries 90%
- Heavy Metals Induced Health Risk Assessment Through Consumption of Selected Commercially Available Spices in Noakhali District of Bangladesh 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Negligible Risk of the COVID-19 Resurgence Caused by Work Resuming in China (outside Hubei): a Statistical Probability Study 91%
- Are COVID-19 data reliable? The case of the European Union 90%
- Association between COVID-19 infection rates by region and implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions: A cross-sectional study in Japan 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using A Socio-Ecological System (SES) Framework to Explain Factors Influencing Countries’ Success Level in Curbing COVID-19 93%
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 92%
- The psychological impact of 'mild lockdown' in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide survey under a declared state of emergency 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.