Not only a matter of age: Machine learning-based characterization of the differential effect of brain stimulation on skill acquisition
Maceira-Elvira, P.; Popa, T.; Schmid, A.-C.; Cadic-Melchior, A.; Müller, H.; Schaer, R.; Cohen, L. G.; Hummel, F. C.
Show abstract
Brain stimulation shows potential at enhancing cognitive and motor functions in humans. However, multiple studies assessing its effects on behavior show heterogeneous results, especially in healthy older subjects. We propose a new method to predict an individuals likelihood and the magnitude of the benefit from stimulation, based on the baseline performance of a sequential motor task, framed in the context of their age. Our results show a differential effect of stimulation, in which individuals with less efficient learning mechanisms benefit from stimulation, while those possessing optimal learning strategies resent a detrimental effect. Importantly, this differential effect was determined by ones ability to integrate task-relevant information at the early stages of training, and not the age. This study paves the way towards the personalized application of stimulation to maximize its effects, and constitutes the first steps to implement an individualized translational clinical intervention, based on the state of the neural system. TeaserAge notwithstanding, brain stimulation is most effective in deficient neural systems, while being detrimental to optimal systems Visual abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=121 SRC="FIGDIR/small/544579v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bcfab0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ee55e9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14a7519org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14de600_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Main findingAnodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS), applied over the hand representation of the motor cortex concomitant to the training of a sequential motor sequence, has differential effects as a function of the recipients ability to integrate task-relevant information at the early stages of training. Stimulation benefits individuals with seemingly less efficient learning mechanisms, enabling the rapid storage of the spatial coordinates of the motor sequence and an accelerated optimization of the accuracy of execution. In contrast, individuals possessing optimal learning mechanisms experience detrimental effects of stimulation, leading to drops in the accuracy of execution.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Motor sequence learning elicits mu peak-specific corticospinal plasticity 94%
- Combining muscle-computer interface guided training with bihemispheric tDCS improves upper limb function in chronic stroke patients 94%
- Theta-burst stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex modulates tactile acuity of tongue 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reward-driven enhancements in motor control are robust to TMS manipulation 94%
- Regional and age-dependent Effects of Cortical Magnetic Stimulation on Unconstrained Reaching Behavior 94%
- Metaplastic neuromodulation via transcranial direct current stimulation has no effect on corticospinal excitability and neuromuscular fatigue 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking changes in corticospinal excitability during visuomotor paired associative stimulation to predict motor resonance rewriting 94%
- Site-specific effects of online rTMS during a working memory task in healthy older adults. 93%
- Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation globally improves learning, but does not selectively potentiate the benefits of Targeted Memory Reactivation on awake memory consolidation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.