Automated clinical conversations across the cataract pathway with an artificial intelligence (AI) conversation agent: a UK regional service evaluation protocol
Automated cataract surgery telephone consult evaluation collaboration, ; Higham, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionDigital technologies have the potential to support clinical pathways. This study aims to evaluate the impact of using an artificial intelligence-based conversational assistant known as Dora in the cataract pathway. Dora conducts clinical conversations with patients over a telephone call both before and after cataract surgery. Through automation of routine activity, the aim is to increase efficiency of the cataract pathway and the capacity of organisations. Method and AnalysisWe will use a mixed-methods cohort-based approach across all sites using Dora in South East England. The study has 3 key objectives, to: 1) Report site-specific variation on the implementation and impact of using Dora 2) assess the impact on the triple bottom line (financial, social and environmental performance) through implementation of Dora 3) understand the real-world patient outcomes of using Dora in clinical pathways. The Dora platform prospectively records symptom and outcome information from each call. We will retrospectively collect data from the hospital record and also collect qualitative data regarding the ease of implementation and patient acceptability of the technology. Ethics and disseminationThis will be registered as a service evaluation at each of the participating clinical sites. Research ethics is not needed as per Health Research Authority guidelines. Site-specific reports will be provided to each participant site as well as an overall report to be disseminated through NHS-England. Results will be published in a formal project report endorsed by stakeholders, and in peer-reviewed scientific reports. Article SummaryO_ST_ABSStrengths and limitations of this studyC_ST_ABSStrengths- This is the largest study on the use of an AI based natural language clinical assistant across multiple different hospital sites, with varied geographical locations, demographics and baseline clinical pathways. - This is a large-scale evaluation with input from multiple independent clinicians, patients, evaluators, economists and strategists. - Standardised data collection from autonomous clinical assistant Limitations- Retrospective collection of hospital level follow up data
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- One and Two Year Visual Outcomes from the Moorfields AMD Database - an Open Science Resource for the Study of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration 91%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 91%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reading; through the eyes of a university student: A double-masked randomised placebo-controlled cross-over protocol investigating coloured spectacle lens efficacy in adults with visual stress 91%
- The challenges of replication: a worked example of methods reproducibility using routinely collected healthcare data 91%
- The evaluation of a web‐based tool for measuring the uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in keratoconus eyes: a prospective open‐label method comparison study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increasing frequency of hospital admissions for retinal detachment and vitreo-retinal surgery in England 2000-2018 91%
- Automated vision screening of children using a mobile graphic device 88%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Risk Factors for Glaucoma Progression in Free-Text Clinical Notes using a Local Small Language Model 92%
- Advancing Question-Answering in Ophthalmology with Retrieval Augmented Generations (RAG): Benchmarking Open-source and Proprietary Large Language Models 89%
- Great expectations: Aligning visual prosthetic development with implantee needs 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic and demographic patterning of family uptake of a paediatric electronic patient portal innovation 91%
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: a systematic review 90%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.