Back

Ketogenic diet as a metabolic vehicle for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of mebendazole and devimistat in preclinical pediatric glioma

Mukherjee, P.; Greenwood, B.; Henao, J.; Kiebish, M. A.; Seyfried, T. N.

2023-06-11 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.06.09.544252 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Invasion of high-grade glioma (HGG) cells through the brain and spinal cord is a leading cause of cancer death in children. Despite advances in treatment, survivors often suffer from lifelong adverse effects of the current toxic therapies used for management. This study investigated the influence of nutritional ketosis on the therapeutic action of mebendazole (MBZ) and devimistat (CPI-613) against the highly invasive VM-M3 and non-invasive CT-2A glioblastoma cells grown orthotopically in juvenile syngeneic mice. Additionally, both drugs were tested in the human pediatric GBM cell line SF-188. DON (6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine) was used as a positive drug control for glutamine targeting. Cerebral implantation of the VM-M3 cells, which are mesenchymal origin, invaded throughout the brain and the spinal column similar to that seen in children with HGG. Neither the CT-2A nor the VM-NM1 glioblastoma stem cell tumors showed distal invasion in syngeneic juvenile mouse brains. The maximum therapeutic benefit of MBZ and CPI-613 on tumor invasion, growth, and mouse survival occurred only when the drugs were administered together with a ketogenic diet (KD). MBZ treatment inhibited both the glutaminolysis and the glycolysis pathways in VM-M3 cells grown either in vivo or in vitro. Both MBZ and CPI-613 significantly reduced the in vitro growth and viability of the SF-188 cells. Moreover, drug administration together with the KD allowed for lower dosing thus minimizing toxicity while improving overall survival of the mice. This preclinical study in two different HGGs, grown in syngeneic juvenile mice, highlights the potential importance of diet/drug therapeutic strategies for managing childhood brain cancer.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
9
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
19
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
20
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
28
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
30
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%