Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions networks and cross-species transfer learning comparison for seven organisms
Martins, Y. C.
Show abstract
MotivationProtein-protein interactions (PPIs) can be used for a plenty of applications like inferring protein functions or even helping the drug discovery process. For human specie, there is a lot of validated information and functional annotations for the proteins in its interactome. In other species, the known interactome is much smaller compared with human and there are many proteins with few or no annotations by specialists. Understanding the interactome of other species helps to trace evolutionary characteristics, compare important biological processes and also build interactomes for new organisms according to other organisms more related with it instead of relying just to the human interactome. ResultsIn this study, we evaluate the performance of PredPrIn workflow in predicting interactome for seven organisms in terms of scalability and precision showing that PredPrIn gets over than 70% of precision and it takes less than three days even on the largest datasets. We made a transfer learning analysis predicting an organism interactome from each other organism, we then showed an implication regarding to their evolutionary relation in the number of ortholog proteins shared between these organisms. We also present an analysis of functional enrichment showing the proportion of shared annotations between positive and false interactions predicted and extraction of topological features of each organism interactome such as proteins acting as hubs and bridge between modules. From each organism, one of the most frequent biological processes was selected and the proteins and pairs present in it were compared in terms of quantity in the interactome available in HINT database for that organism and the one predicted by PredPrIn. In this comparison we showed that we covered those proteins and pairs covered in HINT and also enriched these processes for almost all organisms. ConclusionsIn this work, we have proved the efficiency of PredPrIn workflow for protein interaction prediction for seven different organisms using scalability, performance and transfer learning analyses. We have also made cross-species interactome comparisons showing the most frequent biological processes for each organism as well as the topological features of each organism interactome showing the consistency with hypothesis about biological networks. Finally, we described the enrichment made by PredPrIn in selected biological processes showing that its prediction was important to enhance information about these organisms interactomes.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 protein structure and sequence mutations: evolutionary analysis and effects on virus variants SARS-CoV-2 protein structure and sequence mutations: 96%
- Artificial intelligence tool for the study of COVID-19 microdroplet spread across the human diameter and airborne space 96%
- Improving prediction of drug-target interactions based on fusing multiple features with data balancing and feature selection techniques 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing protein-protein interaction networks of SARS-CoV-2 and (H1N1) influenza using topological features 97%
- A Convolution Based Computational Approach Towards DNA N6-methyladenine Site Identification and Motif Extraction in Rice Genome 97%
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extensive In Silico Analysis of the Functional and Structural Consequences of SNPs in Human ARX Gene 96%
- EnGRNT: Inference of gene regulatory networks using ensemble methods and topological feature extraction 95%
- Viral miRNAs Confer Survival in Host Cells by Targeting Apoptosis Related Host Genes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.