Back

Correlation between antibacterial activity of two Artemisia sp. extracts and their plant characteristics

Mashraqi, A.; Al Abboud, M. A.; Ismail, K. S.; Modafer, Y.; Sharma, M.; El-Shabasy, A.

2023-06-01 microbiology
10.1101/2023.05.30.542989 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The present study evaluated the potential antibacterial activity of Artemisia absinthium L. and Artemisia herba-alba Asso. extracts through different organic and aqueous solvents. The tested bacteria were pathogenic types; Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica and Staphylococcus aureus. There were different affinities for the studied organic solvents besides aqueous one. The comparative study was accomplished with comparing to the morphological, anatomical and palynological characters. The similarity parameter is obtained. ANOVA test analyzed MIC values for both plant extracts. Pearson Correlation Coefficients were determined for all both plant traits. MIC and MBC values were confirmed on using butanol and diethyl ether extracts besides butanol and chloroform extracts for Artemisia absinthium L. and Artemisia hera alba Asso against tested pathogenic bacteria respectively as an alternative natural antibacterial inhibitor agent.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 4%
32.4%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Plants
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Microorganisms
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecules
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
7
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
○ 111 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Gene
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
10
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
11
Current Microbiology
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
○ 427 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
13
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.4%
14
Genomics
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Antibiotics
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Life Sciences
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
18
Microbial Pathogenesis
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
JMIRx Med
◐ 32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Microbiology
● 65 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
22
Archives of Microbiology
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
23
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
24
Environmental Pollution
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
26
Cureus
○ 68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.