Using Explainable AI to understand frailty indicators
Mohsen, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Martin-Morales, A.; Watanabe, D.; Nishi, N.; Nakagata, T.; Yoshida, T.; Miyachi, M.; Mizuguchi, K.; Araki, M.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe prevalence of frailty is on the rise with the aging population and increasing life expectancy, which often is accompanied by comorbidities. Frailty can be effectively detected using Frailty index such as KCL index. Early detection of frailty allows applying measures that reduce the conversion rate to frail, and improve the quality of life in the frail people. Therefore, to facilitate the screening of frailty status at the primary care level, we suggest to produce a shorter version of the KCL questionnaire. AimTo understand the importance of KCL components in the decision making process for frailty and use machine learning approach to shorten the Questionnaire while maintaining reasonable accuracy, making it easier to screen for frailty in primary care. MethodsWe developed an automated framework of three steps: Feature importance determination using Shap values, testing models with Cross-validation with increased addition of selected features. Moreover, we validated the reliability of KCL to detect frailty by comparing the results of KCL criteria with the unsupervised clustering of the data. ResultsOur approach allowed us to identify the most important questions in the KCL questionnaire and demonstrate its performance using a short version with only four questions (4) Do you visit homes of friends?, (6) Are you able to go upstairs without using handrails or the wall for support? (10) Do you feel anxious about falling when you walk?, and (25) (In the past two weeks) Have you felt exhausted for no apparent reason?). We also showed that the data clustering corresponds well with the results of KCL criteria. Discussion and ConclusionWhile it is difficult to predict pre-frail status using shorter KCL questionnaire, it was shown to be fairly accurate in predicting frail status using only four questions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Socio-demographic characteristics and their relation to medical service consumption among elderly in Israel during the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 compared to the corresponding period in 2019 95%
- Informal Sector Employment and the Health Outcomes of Older Workers in India 94%
- ChatGPT-Enhanced ROC Analysis (CERA): A Shiny Web Tool for Finding Optimal Cutoff in Biomarker Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 95%
- An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers 92%
- Evaluating and mitigating unfairness in multimodal remote mental health assessments 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Prospective Cohort Study to Develop Multi-Biomarkers Panel to Define Biological Ageing in Five Different Cohorts from Newborn to Oldest Adult: A Study Protocol 92%
- Prediction of high-risk liver cancer patients from their mutation profile: Benchmarking of mutation calling techniques 91%
- Association of Cognitive Deficits with Sociodemographic Characteristics among Adults with Post-COVID Conditions: Findings from the United States Household Pulse Survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 96%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 95%
- A machine-learning Approach for Stress Detection Using Wearable Sensors in Free-living Environments 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.