Reduction in the risk of mpox infection after MVA-BN vaccination in individuals on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a Spanish cohort study
Fontan-Vela, M.; Hernando, V.; Olmedo, C.; Coma, E.; Martinez, M.; Moreno, D.; Lorusso, N.; Vazquez Torres, M.; Barbas del Buey, J. F.; Roig, J.; Pastor, E.; Galmes Truyols, A.; Artigues Serra, F.; Sancho Martinez, R. M.; Latasa Zamalloa, P.; Perez Martinez, O.; Vazquez Estepa, A.; Garcia Rojas, A.; Barreno Estevez, A. I.; Sanchez-Migallon Naranjo, A.; Perez Martin, J. J.; Peces Jimenez, P.; Morales Romero, R.; Castilla, J.; Garcia Cenoz, M.; Huerta, M.; Boone, A. L. D.; Macias Ortiz, M. J.; Alvarez Rio, V.; Rodriguez Recio, M. J.; Merino Diaz, M.; Berradre Saenz, B.; Teresa-Villegas, M.; Limi
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of at least one-dose of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavaria Nordic (MVA-BN) smallpox vaccine, administered pre-exposure, against mpox virus (MPXV) infection in persons receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV (HIV-PrEP). DesignRetrospective cohort, constructed by deterministic linkage of electronic health records. Setting15 of 19 regions in Spain (>95% population), between July 12 and December 12, 2022 ParticipantsMen [≥]18 years, receiving HIV-PrEP as of July 12 and with no previous MPXV infection or vaccination against mpox. InterventionsOn each day, we matched individuals receiving a first dose of MVA-BN vaccine pre-exposure and unvaccinated controls of the same age ({+/-}5 years) and region. Main outcome measuresWe estimated the risk of laboratory-confirmed infection with MPXV using a Kaplan-Meier estimator and calculated risk ratios (RR) and vaccine effectiveness (VE=1-RR). ResultsWe included 5,660 matched pairs, with a median follow-up of 62 days (interquartile range 24-97). Mpox cumulative incidence was 5.6 per 1,000 (25 cases) in unvaccinated and 3.5 per 1,000 (18 cases) in vaccinated; last case occurred at 63 and 17 days after enrolment, respectively. No effect was found during days 0-6 post-vaccination (VE -38.3; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): -332.7; 46.4), but VE was 65% in [≥]7 days (95%CI 22.9; 88.0) and 79% in [≥]14 days (95%CI 33.3; 100.0) after vaccination. ConclusionAt least one dose of MVA-BN vaccine offered protection against mpox in a most-at-risk population. Because the incidence of mpox was decreasing shortly after the vaccination campaign began, we can only assess its effectiveness shortly after vaccination. Further studies need to assess the VE of a second dose and the duration of protection over time. O_LIWhat is already known on this topic: O_LIMVA-BN vaccination is effective in producing an immune response against mpox virus (MPXV) and has shown clinical efficacy in animal models. C_LIO_LIDuring the current mpox outbreak, observational studies have indicated that MVA-BN vaccines are effective in preventing MPXV infection in real-life. C_LIO_LINo individual-based cohort study with proper implementation of causal inference methods, providing the highest quality of evidence with observational data, has been published to date. C_LI C_LIO_LIWhat this study adds: O_LIThe administration of one dose of MVA-BN vaccine in a high-risk population (men receiving HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis) reduced the risk of MPXV infection by 65% starting 7 days after the administration and by 79% starting 14 days after. C_LIO_LIEffectiveness of MVA-BN vaccine was similar in population under 50 years, a group where childhood smallpox vaccination is rare in Spain. C_LIO_LIThis is the first study to estimate MVA-BN vaccine effectiveness in one of the countries most affected by the mpox outbreak in 2022, with a design and methods providing high quality evidence. C_LI C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MVA-BN Vaccine Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of Real-World Evidence in Outbreak Settings 97%
- Impact of CoronaVac on Covid-19 outcomes of elderly adults in a large and socially unequal Brazilian city: A target trial emulation study 95%
- Effectiveness of second booster compared to first booster and protection conferred by previous SARS CoV-2 infection against symptomatic Omicron BA.2 and BA.4/5 in France 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors that influenced the course of the mpox outbreak in the Netherlands, 2022-2023 95%
- Effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in the Netherlands, September to December 2022 95%
- Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 transmission to household contacts during dominance of Delta variant (B.1.617.2), August-September 2021, the Netherlands 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-dose effectiveness of mpox vaccine in Quebec, Canada: test-negative design with and without adjustment for self-reported exposure risk 96%
- BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Given Confirmed Exposure; Analysis of Household Members of COVID-19 Patients 95%
- Duration of protection after vaccination against yellow fever - systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in people living with HIV: a nationwide prospective cohort study in the Netherlands 95%
- Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous boost immunization with an adenovirus type-5-vectored and protein-subunit-based COVID-19 vaccine (Convidecia/ZF2001): a randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial 94%
- Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization with the Alpha, Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants: a nationwide Danish cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of inactivated and Ad5-nCoV COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA. 2 variant infection, severe illness, and death 94%
- Influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination in European older adults: A multi-country analysis 94%
- The indirect effect of the bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination program: an observational cohort study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.