Back

Adolescents' knowledge of pain medication. Can a specific teaching program in primary school improve knowledge and attitudes toward the use of pain medication?

Andreucci, A.; Estrup Olesen, A.; Merrild, C.; Hardardottir, H.; Al-Janabi, N.; Kjaer Bruun, M.; Moller Larsen, R.; Skovdal Rathleff, M.

2023-06-01 public and global health
10.1101/2023.05.27.23290626 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate how a specifically designed teaching program for adolescents on the subject of "pain medication" affects their knowledge and attitudes regarding pain medication. MethodsThis prospective interventional study used both quantitative and qualitative methods. The teaching intervention was co-developed with end-users. Adolescents completed a questionnaire at 3 time points: 1) at baseline before the teaching intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention and 3) at follow-up after approximately 1-2 months, depending on the schools availability. A qualitative component with interviews on a subsample of participants was carried out between baseline and the 1-2 months follow-up. ResultsNine classes, corresponding to 181 adolescents with a median age of 14 were exposed to the teaching intervention. 22% used pain medication at least once a week at baseline. Their baseline knowledge regarding the mechanism of action, side effects, dosage, and alternative methods to treat pain was low. Their levels of knowledge improved after the teaching intervention and we observed higher levels of knowledge and less uncertainty. However, despite the immediate positive effect, the retainment of knowledge was slightly reduced at the 1-2-month follow-up. DiscussionOur intervention increased the overall knowledge on pain medication and reduced the adolescents uncertainty. However, the retainment of knowledge was reduced after 1-2-month follow-up. Future interventions carried out on a longer time-span and with the inclusion of parents and delivery of online material might be designed to improve retainment of knowledge.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.