Deep Learning models for retinal cell classification
Kostalkowski, M.; Kordecka, K.; Placzkiewicz, J.; Posluszny, A.; Foik, A.
Show abstract
Data analysis is equally important as an experimental part of the scientists work. Therefore any reliable automatization would accelerate research. Histology is a good example, where scientists work with different cell types. The difficulty level can be severe while trying to distinguish cell types from one another. In this paper, we focus on the retina. The retina consists of eight basic cell types, creating a layered structure. Some types of cells overlap within the layer, and some differ significantly in size. Fast and thorough manual analysis of the cross-section is impossible. Even though Deep Learning models are applied in multiple domains, we observe little effort to automatize retinal analysis. Therefore, this research aims to create a model for classifying retinal cell types based on morphology in a cross-section of retinal cell images. In this study, we propose a classification Deep Learning model for retinal cell classification. We implemented two models, each tested in three different approaches: Small dataset, Extended dataset, and One cell type vs. All cell types. Although the problem presented to the trained model was simplified, a significant data imbalance was created from multiclass to binary classification, influencing the models performance. Both, Sequential and Transfer Learning models performed best with the Extended dataset. The Sequential model generated the best overall results. The obtained results allow us to place prepared models within the benchmark of published models. This paper proposes the first Deep Learning tool classifying retinal cell types based on a dataset prepared from publicly available images collated from multiple sources and images obtained in our laboratory. The multiclass approach with an extended dataset showed the best results. With more effort, the model could become an excellent analytical tool.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The influence of stereopsis on visual saliency in a proto-object based model of selective attention 93%
- Explaining #TheShoe based on the optimal color hypothesis: The role of chromaticity vs. luminance distribution in ambiguous image 92%
- The influence of similarity, sensitivity and bias on letter identification 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning-based estimation of spatial gene expression pattern during ESC-derived retinal organoid development 94%
- Interpretable Detection of Epiretinal Membrane from Optical Coherence Tomography with Deep Neural Networks 94%
- A hybrid CNN-Random Forest algorithm for bacterial spore segmentation and classification in TEM images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing a computational model of visual problem solving with human vision on a difficult vision task. 94%
- DGCyTOF: deep learning with graphic cluster visualization to predict cell types of single cell mass cytometry data 94%
- Pre-training artificial neural networks with spontaneous retinal activity improves motion prediction in natural scenes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.