Back

Self-Directed Home-Based Dim-Light Melatonin Onset Collection: The Circadia Pilot Study

Bormes, G.; Love, J.; Oluwaseun, A.; Cherry, J.; Kunorozva, L.; Qadri, S.; Rahman, S.; Westover, B.; Winkelman, J. W.; Lane, J.

2023-05-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.05.26.23290467 medRxiv
Show abstract

Study ObjectivesTo test the feasibility of a novel at-home salivary Dim Light Melatonin Onset (DLMO) assessment protocol to measure the endogenous circadian phase of 10 individuals (1 Advanced Sleep-Wake Phase Disorder patient (ASWPD), 4 Delayed Sleep-Wake Phase Disorder patients (DSWPD), and 5 controls). MethodsThe study involved 10 participants (sex at birth: females = 9; male= 1), who ranged between 27 to 63 years old, with an average age of 38 years old. Our study population consisted of 7 individuals who identified as white and 3 who identified as Asian. Our participants were diverse in gender identity (woman = 7, male = 1, transgender = 1, nonbinary = 1, none = 1).The study tracked the sleep and activity patterns of 10 individuals over a 5-6 week period using self-reported online sleep diaries and objective actigraphy data. Participants completed two self-directed DLMO assessments, approximately one week apart, adhering to objective compliance measures. Participants completed the study entirely remotely: they completed all sleep diaries and other evaluations online and were mailed a kit with all materials needed to perform the actigraphy and at-home sample collections. ResultsSalivary DLMO times were calculated for 8/10 participants using the Hockeystick method. DLMO times were on average 3 hours and 18 minutes earlier than self-reported sleep onset times (DSPD: 12:04 AM, controls: 9:55 PM.) Among the 6 participants for whom we calculated two separate DLMO times, DLMOs 1 and 2 were 96% correlated (p<0.0005.) ConclusionsOur results indicate that self-directed, at-home DLMO assessments are feasible and accurate. The current protocol may serve as a framework to reliably assess circadian phase in both clinical and general populations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
47.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
4
Sleep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
5
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
6
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
7
Sleep Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
9
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
10
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
11
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
12
Journal of Biological Rhythms
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
JAMA
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
14
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
18
Food & Function
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
19
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
Journal of Sleep Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
22
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%