The Face of a Surgeon: An Analysis of Demographic Representation in Three Leading Artificial Intelligence Text-to-Image Generators
Ali, R.; Tang, O. Y.; Connolly, I. D.; Abdulrazeq, H. A.; Mirza, F. N.; Lim, R. K.; Johnston, B. R.; Groff, M. W.; Williamson, T.; Svokos, K.; Libby, T. J.; Shin, J. H.; Gokaslan, Z. L.; Doberstein, C. E.; Zou, J.; Asaad, Z. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundThis study investigates the accuracy of three prominent artificial intelligence (AI) text-to-image generators--DALL-E 2, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion--in representing the demographic realities in the surgical profession, addressing raised concerns about the perpetuation of societal biases, especially profession-based stereotypes. MethodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 2,400 images generated across eight surgical specialties by each model. An additional 1,200 images were evaluated based on geographic prompts for three countries. Images were generated using a prompt template, "A photo of the face of a [blank]", with blank replaced by a surgical specialty. Geographic-based prompting was evaluated by specifying the most populous countries for three continents (United States, Nigeria, and China). ResultsThere was a significantly higher representation of female (average=35.8% vs. 14.7%, P<0.001) and non-white (average=37.4% vs. 22.8%, P<0.001) surgeons among trainees than attendings. DALL-E 2 reflected attendings true demographics for female surgeons (15.9% vs. 14.7%, P=0.386) and non-white surgeons (22.6% vs. 22.8%, P=0.919) but underestimated trainees representation for both female (15.9% vs. 35.8%, P<0.001) and non-white (22.6% vs. 37.4%, P<0.001) surgeons. In contrast, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion had significantly lower representation of images of female (0% and 1.8%, respectively) and non-white (0.5% and 0.6%, respectively) surgeons than DALL-E 2 or true demographics (all P<0.001). Geographic-based prompting increased non-white surgeon representation (all P<0.001), but did not alter female representation (P=0.779). ConclusionsWhile Midjourney and Stable Diffusion amplified societal biases by depicting over 98% of surgeons as white males, DALL-E 2 depicted more accurate demographics, although all three models underestimated trainee representation. These findings underscore the necessity for guardrails and robust feedback systems to prevent AI text-to-image generators from exacerbating profession-based stereotypes, and the importance of bolstering the representation of the evolving surgical field in these models future training sets.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unplanned Hospital Visits after Ambulatory Surgical Care 91%
- Prohibiting Babel - A call for professional remote interpreting services in pre-operation anaesthesia information 91%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 91%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 90%
- The effect of digital-enabled multidisciplinary therapy conferences on efficiency and quality of the decision making in prostate-cancer care 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expert Surgeons and Deep Learning Models Can Predict the Outcome of Surgical Hemorrhage from One Minute of Video 94%
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 93%
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 94%
- Financial Conflicts of Interest among U.S. Physician Authors of 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Study 91%
- Calculated grades, predicted grades, forecasted grades and actual A-level grades: Reliability, correlations and predictive validity in medical school applicants, undergraduates, and postgraduates in a time of COVID-19 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Student self-assessment: feasibility, advantages and limitations Example of a workshop for trainee surgeons using a suture score 93%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 93%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.