Back

Wiring between close nodes in biological networks evolves more quickly than between distant nodes

Gil-Gomez, A. M.; Rest, J. S.

2023-05-24 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.05.23.541989 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As species diverge, a wide range of evolutionary processes lead to changes in protein-protein interaction networks and metabolic networks. The rate at which biological networks evolve is an important question in evolutionary biology. Previous empirical work has focused on interactomes from model organisms to calculate rewiring rates, but this is limited by the relatively small number of species and sparse nature of network data across species. We present a proxy for variation in network topology: variation in drug-drug interactions (DDIs), obtained by studying drug combinations (DCs) across taxa. Here, we propose the rate at which DDIs change across species as an estimate of the rate at which the underlying biological network changes as species diverge. We computed the evolutionary rates of DDIs using previously published data from a high throughput study in gram-negative bacteria. Using phylogenetic comparative methods, we found that DDIs diverge rapidly over short evolutionary time periods, but that divergence saturates over longer time periods. In parallel, we mapped drugs with known targets in protein-protein interaction and co-functional networks. We found that the targets of synergistic DDIs are closer in these networks than other types of DCs and that synergistic interactions have a higher evolutionary rate, meaning that nodes that are closer evolve at a faster rate. Future studies of network evolution may use DC data to gain larger-scale perspectives on the details of network evolution within and between species.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.4%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
10
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
11
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
21
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%