Back

Dorsal and median raphe neuronal firing dynamics characterized by non-linear metrics

Pascovich Rognoni, C.; Serantes, D.; Rodriguez, A.; Mateos, D. M.; Gonzalez, J.; Gallo, D.; Rivas, M.; Devera, A.; Lagos, P.; Rubido, N.; Torterolo, P.

2023-05-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.05.23.541902 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The dorsal (DRN) and median (MRN) raphe are the main serotonergic nuclei, being implicated in sleep and mood regulation. The DRN is mainly serotonergic, where neurons have regular spiking activity, slow firing rate (FR), and long action potential duration (APD). The MRN is divided in a median serotonergic region and a paramedian region, containing principally GABAergic neurons, resulting in more diverse neurochemical and electrophysiological features. In the present study, we aimed to enrich the characterization of the raphe nuclei neurons by using non-linear metrics. This was done by analyzing the neuronal basal firing profile in both nuclei of urethane-anesthetized rats using Ordinal Patterns (OP) Entropy, Bins Entropy, and Permutation Lempel-Ziv Complexity (PLZC). In a first step, we found that typical linear metrics - such as FR, coefficient of variation (CV), and APD - fail to distinguish between MRN and DRN neurons, while OP entropy is significantly different between these nuclei. We also found that the FR has a strong linear relationship with CV, Bins Entropy, and PLZC. Similarly, CV has a strong correlation with FR and Bins Entropy, whereas PLZC shows a strong linear fit with Bins Entropy. However, OP Entropy has either a weak or no linear relationship with the rest of the metrics tested, suggesting that OP Entropy is a good metric to differentiate neuronal firing profiles. In a second step, we studied how these metrics are affected by the oscillatory properties of the firing patterns. We found that all metrics are sensitive to rhythmicity - with the exception of OP Entropy. Again, this highlights OP Entropy as a powerful and useful quantity for the characterization of neuronal discharge patterns.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.3%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Neuroscience Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
13
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
17
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
28
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
29
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
30
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%