Detection of mycobacterial pulmonary diseases via breath analysis in clinical practice
Su, B.; Feng, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhu, J.; He, M.; Wu, L.; Sheng, Q.; Guan, P.; Chen, P.; Kuang, H.; Li, D.; Wang, W.; Feng, Z.; Tan, Y.; Liu, J.; Tan, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundCurrent clinical tests for mycobacterial pulmonary diseases (MPD), such as pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and non-tuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary diseases (NTM-PD), are inaccurate, time-consuming, sputum-dependent, and/or costly. We aimed to develop a simple, rapid and accurate breath test for screening and differential diagnosis of MPD patients in clinical settings. MethodsExhaled breath samples were collected from 93 PTB, 68 NTM-PD and 4 PTB&NTM-PD patients, 93 patients with other pulmonary diseases (OPD) and 181 healthy controls (HC), and tested using the online high-pressure photon ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometer (HPPI-TOF-MS). Machine learning models were trained and blindly tested for the detection of MPD, PTB, NTM-PD, and the discrimination between PTB and NTM-PD, respectively. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by metrics of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsThe breath PTB detection model achieved a sensitivity of 73.5%, a specificity of 85.8%, an accuracy of 82.9%, and an AUC of 0.895 in the blinded test set (n=141). The corresponding metrics for the NTM-PD detection model were 86.4%, 93.2%, 92.1% and 0.972, respectively. For distinguishing PTB from NTM-PD, the model also achieved good performance with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of 85.3%, 81.8%, 83.9% and 0.947, respectively. 22 potential breath biomarkers associated with MPD were putatively identified and discussed, which included 2-furanmethanol, ethanol, 2-butanone, etc. ConclusionsThe developed breathomics-based MPD detection method was demonstrated for the first time with good performance for potential screening and diagnosis of PTB and NTM-PD using a refined operating procedure on the HPPI-TOF-MS platform.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Urine metabolomics of rats with chronic atrophic gastritis 93%
- Development and Evaluation of AccuPower® COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower® SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples 93%
- Feasibility of Integrating Canine Olfaction with Chemical and Microbial Profiling of Urine to Detect Lethal Prostate Cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel strategy for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants based on multiplex PCR-MALDI-TOF MS 93%
- Alterations of human lung and gut microbiome in non-small cell lung carcinomas and distant metastasis 91%
- Evaluating the feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity of next-generation molecular methods for pleural infection diagnosis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of Tuberculosis by The Analysis of Exhaled Breath Particles with High-resolution Mass Spectrometry 94%
- Development and Clinical Validation of Swaasa AI Platform for screening and prioritization of Pulmonary TB 93%
- Small-molecule metabolome identifies potential therapeutic targets against COVID-19 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical performance of a highly sensitive system to detect gene variants using next-generation sequencing for lung cancer companion diagnostics 92%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 91%
- SalivaSTAT: Direct-PCR and pooling of saliva samples collected in healthcare and community setting for SARS-CoV-2 mass surveillance 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of mass spectrometry-based targeted assay for direct detection of novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus from clinical specimens 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Different Respiratory Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Detection Tests: test performance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of COVID-19 vaccination 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.