Left Bundle Branch Pacing Facilitated by Novel Surface Electrocardiography in Comparison with Electrophysiology Recording System

BackgroundLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) had been proven to be feasible and safe in patients with a pacemaker indication. In this study, we assessed the feasibility and safety of LBBP procedure using simplified ECG monitoring and LBBP criteria in comparison with that by using the conventional EP system and currently adopted LBBP criteria. MethodsThe single-center study included 143 consecutive patients from March 2021 to January 2022. The operator was single-blind to the electrophysiology recording system (EP system), and only observed the electrophysiological characteristics of the four-lead ECG monitor and the pacing system analyzer (PSA) by naked eye. Other researchers kept synchronized records of the EP system, and analyzed whether the data were correct and consistent after the operation. Intraoperative data were collected and the safety of 3-month follow-up after operation were evaluated. ResultsOf 143 patients enrolled, 139 successfully performed LBBP, with a success rate of 97.2%, and the judgement concordance with EP system was 99.3%. The total operation time was 78.9{+/-}26.5min, the total fluoroscopy time was 9.5{+/-}6.1min, the fluoroscopy time of left bundle branch (LBB) lead deployment 3.0{+/-}2.6min, which had no significant difference with previous studies. Ventricular septal perforation occurred in 2 patients during the operation. Pacing parameters were stable and heart function improved during follow-up. ConclusionsThe simplified LBBP implantation method without an EP system and only relying on a simplified ECG combined with an analyzer is clinically feasible and safe and can be promoted in clinical practice.