Back

Breast cancer risk based on a deep learning predictor of senescent cells in normal tissue

Heckenbach, I.; Powell, M.; Fuller, S.; Henry, J.; Rysdyk, S.; Cui, J.; Teklu, A. A.; Verdin, E.; Benz, C.; Scheibye-Knudsen, M.

2023-05-23 oncology
10.1101/2023.05.22.23290327 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe ability to predict future risk of cancer development in non-malignant biopsies is poor. Cellular senescence has been associated with cancer as either a barrier mechanism restricting autonomous cell proliferation or a tumor-promoting microenvironmental mechanism that secretes pro-inflammatory paracrine factors. With most work done in non-human models and the heterogenous nature of senescence the precise role of senescent cells in the development of cancer in humans is not well understood. Further, more than one million non-malignant breast biopsies are taken every year that could be a major source of risk-stratification for women. MethodsWe applied single cell deep learning senescence predictors based on nuclear morphology to histological images of 4,411 H&E-stained breast biopsies from healthy female donors. Senescence was predicted in the epithelial, stromal, and adipocyte compartments using predictor models trained on cells induced to senescence by ionizing radiation (IR), replicative exhaustion (RS), or antimycin A, Atv/R and doxorubicin (AAD) exposures. To benchmark our senescence-based prediction results we generated 5-year Gail scores, the current clinical gold standard for breast cancer risk prediction. FindingsWe found significant differences in adipocyte-specific IR and AAD senescence prediction for the 86 out of 4,411 healthy women who developed breast cancer an average 4.8 years after study entry. Risk models demonstrated that individuals in the upper median of scores for the adipocyte IR model had a higher risk (OR=1.71 [1.10-2.68], p=0.019), while the adipocyte AAD model revealed a reduced risk (OR=0.57 [0.36-0.88], p=0.013). Individuals with both adipocyte risk factors had an OR of 3.32 ([1.68-7.03], p<0.001). Alone, 5-year Gail scores yielded an OR of 2.70 ([1.22-6.54], p=0.019). When combining Gail scores with our adipocyte AAD risk model, we found that individuals with both of these risk predictors had an OR of 4.70 ([2.29-10.90], p<0.001). InterpretationAssessment of senescence with deep learning allows considerable prediction of future cancer risk from non-malignant breast biopsies, something that was previously impossible to do. Furthermore, our results suggest an important role for microscope image-based deep learning models in predicting future cancer development. Such models could be incorporated into current breast cancer risk assessment and screening protocols. FundingThis study was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (#NNF17OC0027812), and by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Fund SenNet program (U54AG075932).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.5%
4
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
7
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
9
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
20
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
29
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%