Back

Identification of neuropathology-based subgroups in multiple sclerosis using a data-driven approach

de Boer, A.; van den Bosch, A. M. R.; Mekkes, N. J.; Fransen, N.; Hoekstra, E.; Smolders, J.; Hamann, J.; Huitinga, I.; Holtman, I. R.

2023-05-16 neurology
10.1101/2023.05.15.23289980 medRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a heterogeneous disorder with regards to clinical presentation and pathophysiology. Stratification into biologically distinct subgroups could enhance prognostication and efficacious allocation to disease-modifying therapies. In this study, we identified MS subgroups by performing a clustering analysis on neuropathology data collected for MS donors in the Netherlands Brain Bank (NBB) autopsy cohort. The input dataset contained detailed information on white matter lesion load, the proportion of active, mixed active/inactive, inactive and remyelinating lesions, microglia morphology in these lesions, and the presence of microglial nodules, perivascular cuffs and cortical lesions for 228 donors. A factor analysis was performed to reduce noise and redundancy prior to hierarchical clustering with K-means consolidation. Four subgroups with distinct patterns of white matter lesions were identified. These were subsequently validated with additional clinical, neuropathological and genetic data. The subgroups differed with regards to disease progression and duration, the timing of motor, sensory and other relevant signs and symptoms, patterns of cortical lesions and the presence of B cells. Age at MS onset and sex, previously associated with milder forms of MS, did not differ between the subgroups; the subgroups could also not be distinguished based on the manifestation of clinical signs and symptoms. The available genetic data was used to calculate MS polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for donors included in the NBB cohort. The MS PRS did not differ between the subgroups, but was significantly correlated with the first and second dimension of the factor analysis, the latter lending genetic support to our subdivision. Taken together, these findings suggest a complex relationship between neuropathological subgroups and clinical characteristics, indicating that post-mortem cohort studies are critical to better stratify patients and understand underlying neuropathophysiological mechanisms, in order to ultimately achieve personalised medicine in MS.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Neuropathologica
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
5
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
8
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
9
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
11
Journal of Neuroinflammation
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
13
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Molecular Neurobiology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
26
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
28
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%