Back

Projecting the potential impact of an Omicron XBB.1.5 wave in Shanghai, China

Yu, H.; Liu, H.; Xu, X.; Deng, X.; Hu, Z.; Sun, R.; Zou, J.; Dong, J.; Wu, Q.; Chen, X.; Yi, L.; Cai, J.; Zhang, J.; Ajelli, M.

2023-05-14 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.05.10.23289761
Show abstract

China experienced a major nationwide wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections in December 2022, immediately after lifting strict interventions, despite the majority of the population having already received inactivated COVID-19 vaccines. Due to the rapid waning of protection and the emergence of Omicron XBB.1.5, the risk of another COVID-19 wave remains high. It is still unclear whether the health care system will be able to manage the demand during this potential XBB.1.5 wave and if the number of associated deaths can be reduced to a level comparable to that of seasonal influenza. Thus, we developed a mathematical model of XBB.1.5 transmission using Shanghai as a case study. We found that a potential XBB.1.5 wave is less likely to overwhelm the health care system and would result in a death toll comparable to that of seasonal influenza, albeit still larger, especially among elderly individuals. Our analyses show that a combination of vaccines and antiviral drugs can effectively mitigate an XBB.1.5 epidemic, with a projected number of deaths of 2.08 per 10,000 individuals. This figure corresponds to a 70-80% decrease compared to the previous Omicron wave and is comparable to the level of seasonal influenza. The peak prevalence of hospital admissions and ICU admissions are projected at 28.89 and 2.28 per 10,000 individuals, respectively, suggesting the need for a moderate increase in the capacity of the health care system. Our findings emphasize the importance of improving vaccination coverage, particularly among the older population, and the use of antiviral treatments.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 27%
16.4%
2
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 0.3%
14.2%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 13%
10.9%
4
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 3%
3.2%
6
Infectious Disease Modelling
based on 50 papers
Top 3%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 7%
2.6%
8
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 5%
1.7%
9
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 14%
1.7%
10
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 15%
1.4%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 11%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 12%
1.4%
14
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 32%
1.4%
15
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 20%
0.9%
17
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 5%
0.9%
19
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 10%
0.9%
20
Journal of Theoretical Biology
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Nature Human Behaviour
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
23
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 32%
0.7%
24
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
based on 17 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Physics
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 11%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
0.7%