DRUM-PD/HD: The Impact of a Pilot Group Drum-Based Music Therapy Intervention on Quality of Life and Motor Symptoms in Parkinson Disease and Huntington Disease
Wainwright, L.; Kang, K.; Dayanim, G.; Bedell, C.; Devlin, K.; Lanham, D.; Suarez-Cedeno, G.; Baker, J. A.; Bastepe-Gray, S.; Bang, J.; Pantelyat, A.
Show abstract
Rhythm-based therapeutic interventions have widely been used in patients with neurologic disorders to address motor and quality of life outcomes. Although group drumming has been explored in several pilot studies of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and Huntington disease (HD), caregiver burden and their quality-of-life outcomes have received less attention. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of group drumming on quality of life and motor symptoms in PD and HD patients as well as their caregivers. A total of 17 participants (PD = 6, caregivers of PD = 6, HD = 3, caregivers of HD = 2) attended the 60-minute drum-based group music therapy intervention twice a week for 12 weeks. Participants were assigned to two drumming intervention groups based on their diagnosis:1) patients diagnosed with PD and their study partners, 2) patients diagnosed with HD and their study partners. In group drumming sessions, both patients and caregiver participants utilized a variety of percussion instruments based on their personal preferences or physical abilities to facilitate movement skills and group cohesion. They were asked to complete questionnaires about quality of life and motor functioning at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks (6 weeks post-intervention completion). Caregivers burden scores were also collected at these time points. Furthermore, all participants completed simple exit interview questionnaires in their follow-up visit. The PD participants and their caregivers showed an opposite trend in social role satisfaction. From baseline to 6 weeks, there were significant differences in social role satisfaction between PD participants and PD caregivers where PD participants reported a decrease in social satisfaction (Mean = -2.30, Standard Deviation = 1.64) while PD caregivers experienced an increase (M = 3.80, SD = 3.08), p = .02. In contrast, a different pattern was shown from 12 weeks to 18 weeks, where PD participants showed an increase in social satisfaction (M = 2.53, SD = 1.29), while PD caregivers demonstrated a decrease in social satisfaction (M = -2.10, SD = 3.35), p =.03. Drumming in a group setting may serve as an effective tool to enhance movement and promote social cohesion through rhythmic auditory-motor entrainment, thereby supporting quality of life in PD; further studies in HD are indicated as well.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pilot Interventional Study on Feasibility and Effectiveness of the CUE1 device in Parkinson’s disease 95%
- Online unsupervised performance-based cognitive testing: a feasible and reliable approach to scalable cognitive phenotyping of Parkinson’s patients 94%
- Timely referral for advanced therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Development of a screening tool 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing and Predicting Efficacy of Dance Intervention for Parkinson's Disease 98%
- Investigating the impact of physical activity on mitochondrial function in Parkinson's disease (PARKEX): Study protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial 96%
- A Systematic Review of the Association between Sedentary Behavior and Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinsons Disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitivity to somatomotor conflicts links frontal subcortical dysfunction and minor hallucinations in Parkinson's disease 95%
- Non-Motor symptoms in prodromal Parkinson’s disease are linked to reduced Quality of Life 94%
- The Sequence Effect Worsens over Time in Parkinson’s disease and Responds to Open and Closed-Loop Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.