Development and Validation of Comorbidity Index to Predict In-hospital Mortality Risk for Patients with Steven-Johnson Syndrome
Li, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundStevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a spectrum of severe drug reactions that has a high in-hospital mortality from 5% to 20%. Early risk prediction for in-hospital mortality in SJS/TEN can be informative for clinical management. This study aimed to develop an in-hospital mortality risk calculator for SJS based on patient comorbidities. MethodsPatients who were diagnosed with SJS/TEN were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database between Q4 2015-2020. SJS patients were randomly sampled into two equal experimental and validation groups. The weight for each comorbidity was determined from a multivariable logistic regression to develop into a single SJS Index. ResultsThere were 4519 SJS (mortality rate 5.05%), 873 SJS-TEN (mortality rate 13.06%), and 759 TEN (mortality rate 17.00%) patients identified. The SJS Index had good discrimination power (c-statistic=0.704, 95% CI=0.656-0.753) and was well-calibrated (Brier score=0.049). SJS Index had similar performance in multivariable regression model with all comorbidities (DeLong p-value=0.621) and validation group (DeLong p-value=0.634). The index had significantly better discriminative power than Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) (DeLong p-value=0.001). Applying the SJS Index to SJS-TEN patients showed comparable discriminative powers (DeLong test p-value=0.284). In TEN patients, SJS Index remained good calibration (Brier score=0.062) but discriminative power decreased (DeLong p-value=0.005). After adjusting for age, race, and ethnicity, SJS Index had improved performance in all groups. ConclusionsThe SJS Index can effectively discriminate and predict in-hospital mortality in SJS and was externally validated in NIS. SJS/TEN often has emergent presentation and immediate intervention is required, this risk score can give an initial assessment of the mortality based on medical records alone and thus offer a quick insight for clinicians for management. In addition, this study demonstrated the possibility of the SJS Index being used as one composite metric to develop a more comprehensive risk-calculator score.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection on young adult population: international observational federated study based on electronic health records through the 4CE consortium 95%
- Characteristics and outcome profile of Hospitalized African COVID-19 patients: The Ethiopian Context 94%
- Laboratory Biomarkers of COVID-19 Disease Severity and Outcome: Findings from a Developing Country 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pulmonary haemorrhage as a frequent cause of death among patients with severe complicated Leptospirosis in Southern Sri Lanka 92%
- Smartphone-based infrared thermal imaging for differentiating venomous snakebites from non-venomous and dry bites 91%
- Assessment of the new World Health Organization’s dengue classification for predicting severity of illness and level of healthcare required 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 as a prognostic biomarker for disease progression in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 93%
- Safety of anti-thrombotic therapy in acute aortic dissection; single center, observational study 92%
- Factors influencing plasma galectin-3 concentrations in catheter-bearing hospitalized patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 94%
- Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study 93%
- Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes of Severe Patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.