Vasectomy workforce and utilization in the United States, 2019
Bodas, M.; Strasser, J.; Banawa, R.; Luo, E.; Schenk, E.; Chen, C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine the workforce that provides vasectomies in the United States using national-level medical claims data (IQVIA Dx, 2019). MethodsWe combined IQVIA Dx 2019 data on medical claims with information on clinician characteristics and clinician type from the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES) and the American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile. We assessed state-level trends in vasectomy provision. We used multivariate regressions to evaluate the association between clinician characteristics and two outcomes: providing at least one vasectomy and total volume of vasectomies in 2019. ResultsWe found total of 147,618 vasectomies performed by 7,592 clinicians in the IQVIA Dx 2019 data. About 76% clinicians were urologists, 16% family medicine specialists, and about 8% were general surgeons. Urologists performed about 91% of all vasectomies. Overall, about 92% of clinicians were located in urban areas. Multivariate regression analysis showed that clinicians that were female (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.12, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) (0.09 - 0.15)), graduated from osteopathic schools (OR 0.77, 95% CI (0.60 - 0.98)) had lower odds of providing vasectomies. ConclusionsClinicians from multiple specialties performed vasectomies in the U.S. Most often, this procedure was performed by male urologists practicing in urban areas. Wide state-level variations exist in vasectomy provision. Clinicians gender, location and type of medical degree received were associated with their vasectomy provision.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 92%
- Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain; cross sectional survey data from the SACHA study 91%
- Access and quality of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Myofascial Frequency Syndrome: A novel syndrome of bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms associated with myofascial pelvic floor dysfunction 91%
- An Observational Study of COVID-19 from A Large Healthcare System in Northern New Jersey: Diagnosis, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes 89%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prescribing patterns for medical treatment of suspected prostatic obstruction: A spatiotemporal statistical analysis of Scottish open access data 93%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 91%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Online tests for sexually transmitted infections – Friend or Foe? An analysis of providers in the United Kingdom 88%
- How did COVID-19 measures impact sexual behaviour and access to HIV/STI services in Panama? Results from a national cross-sectional online survey 88%
- Going beyond regular and casual: development of a classification of sexual partner types to enhance partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, a mixed methods approach 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.