Epigenetic fidelity in complex biological systems and implications for ageing
Duffield, T.; Csuka, L.; Akalan, A.; Vega Magdaleno, G.; Palmer, D.; de Magalhaes, J. P.
Show abstract
The study of age is plagued by a lack of delineation between the causes and effects within the ageing phenotype. This has made it difficult to fully explain the biological ageing process from first principles with a single definition. Lacking a clear description of the underlying root cause of biological age confounds clarity in this critical field. In this paper, we demonstrate that the epigenetic system has a built-in, unavoidable fidelity limitation and consequently demonstrate that there is a distinct class of DNA methylation loci that increases in variance in a manner tightly correlated with chronological age. We demonstrate the existence of epigenetic activation functions and that topological features beyond these activation functions represent deregulation. We show that the measurement of epigenetic fidelity is an accurate predictor of cross-species age and present a deep-learning model that predicts chronological age exclusively from knowledge of variance. We find that the classes of epigenetic loci in which variation correlates with chronological age control genes that regulate transcription and suggest that the inevitable consequence of this is a feedback cycle of system-wide deregulation causing a progressive collapse into the phenotype of age. This paper represents a novel theory of biological systemic ageing with arguments as to why, how and when epigenetic ageing is inevitable.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuron-specific chromatin disruption at CpG islands and aging-related regions in Kabuki syndrome mice 93%
- A murine aging cell atlas reveals cell identity and tissue-specific trajectories of aging 92%
- Single-cell methylation sequencing data reveal succinct metastatic migration histories and tumor progression models 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.