Interaction between risk SNPs of Developmental Dyslexia and Parental Education on Reading Ability: Evidence for Differential-Susceptibility Theory
Yang, Q.; Cheng, C.; Wang, Z.; Blesky, J.; Zhao, J.
Show abstract
While genetic and environmental factors have been shown as predictors of childrens reading ability, the interaction effects of identified genetic risk susceptibility and specified environmental for reading ability have rarely been investigated. The current study assessed potential gene-environmental (GxE) interactions on reading ability in 1477 school-aged children. The gene-environment interactions on character recognition were investigated by an exploration analysis between the risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which were discovered by previous genome-wide association studies of developmental dyslexia (DD), and parental education (PE). The re-parameterized regression analysis suggested that this GxE interaction conformed to the strong differential-susceptibility model. Results showed that rs281238 exhibits a significant interaction with PE on character recognition. Children with "T" genotype profited from high PE, whereas they performed worse in low PE environment, but "CC" genotype children were not malleable in different PE environments. Research HighlightsO_LIWe calculated the Cumulative Genetic Score (CGS) of 9 SNPs related to developmental dyslexia, and found that the interaction between CGS and parental education on reading ability. The GxE comforted to the differential-susceptibility model that those individuals carrying more plasticity alleles were affected more than those carrying more fewer. C_LIO_LIThe interaction between rs281238 and parental education conformed to the strong differential-susceptibility model that children with "T" allele would have highest reading ability in positive environment and lowest reading ability in adversity environment, whereas children without "T" allele would not be affected by parental education. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MR-DoC2: bidirectional causal modeling with instrumental variables and data from relatives 92%
- Intergenerational transmission of education and ADHD: Effects of parental genotypes 91%
- Exploring the relationships between autozygosity, educational attainment, and cognitive ability in a contemporary, trans-ancestral American sample 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Personality and MB-COMT gene: molecular-genetic and epigenetic associations with NEO-PI-R personality domains and facets in monozygotic twins 90%
- Improving accuracy and precision of heritability estimation in twin studies: Reassessing the measurement error assumption 89%
- A machine learning approach to predicting autism risk genes: Validation of known genes and discovery of new candidates 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The neurodevelopment of delay discounting for monetary rewards in pre-adolescent children 91%
- The Long-Term Impact of Digital Media on Brain Development in Children 90%
- Maternal childhood trauma and perinatal distress predict the development of attention in infants from 6 to 18 months in a Swedish cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of ability of AlphaMissense to identify variants affecting susceptibility to common disease 88%
- A Tool for Translating Polygenic Scores onto the Absolute Scale Using Summary Statistics 87%
- Lifestyle Risk Score for aggregating multiple lifestyle factors: Handling missingness of individual lifestyle components in meta-analysis of gene-by-lifestyle interactions 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anticipatory Emotions and Academic Performance: The Role of Boredom in a Preservice Teachers' Lab Experience 89%
- Linear vector models of time perception account for saccade and stimulus novelty interactions 89%
- Neuromagnetic speech discrimination responses are associated with reading-related skills in dyslexic and typical readers 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.