A novel multimodal approach to improve upper extremity function after moderate-to-severe stroke
Sethi, A.; Pacual-Leone, A.; Santarnecchi, E.; Almalki, G.; Chandramouli, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundInterventions to recover upper extremity (UE) function after moderate-to-severe stroke are limited. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is an emerging non-invasive technique to improve neuronal plasticity and may potentially augment functional outcomes when combined with existing interventions, such as functional electrical stimulation (FES). ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of combined tRNS and FES-facilitated task practice to improve UE impairment and function after moderate-to-severe stroke. MethodsFourteen individuals with UE weakness were randomized into one of two groups: 1) tRNS with FES-facilitated task practice, or 2) sham-tRNS with FES-facilitated task practice. Both groups involved 18 intervention sessions (3 per week for 6 weeks). We evaluated number of sessions completed, adverse effects, participant satisfaction, and intervention fidelity between two therapists. UE impairment (Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity, FMUE), function (Wolf Motor Function Test, WMFT), participation (Stroke Impact Scale hand score, SIS-H), and grip strength were assessed at baseline, within 1 week and 3 months after completing the intervention. ResultsAll participants completed the 18 intervention sessions. Participants reported minimal adverse effects (mild tingling in head). The two trained therapists demonstrated 93% adherence and 96% competency with the intervention protocol. FMUE and SIS-H improved significantly more in the tRNS group than in the sham-tRNS group at both timepoints (p[≤]0.05), and the differences observed exceeded the clinically meaningful differences for these scores. The WMFT and paretic hand grip strength improved in both groups after the intervention (p[≤]0.05), with no significant between group differences. ConclusionOur findings show for the first time that combining tRNS and FES-facilitated task practice is a feasible and promising approach to improve UE impairment and function after moderate-to-severe stroke.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensorimotor upper limb therapy does not improve somatosensory function and may negatively interfere with motor recovery: a randomized controlled trial in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke 95%
- Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability and Muscle Synergies During Complex Locomotor Task in Individuals With and Without Cerebral Palsy: A TMS and EMG Study 95%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke 95%
- Non-Invasive Spinal Neuromodulation Enables Volitional Anti-Gravity Leg Movements After Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury: Responders vs. Non-Responders 94%
- Positive effects of functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling on perception of effort, cerebral blood flow and cognition in post-stroke patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Upper Limb Motor Improvement after TBI: Systematic Review of Interventions 96%
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation 95%
- Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose, intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: The SMARTS2 randomized trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Robot-based assessment of HIV-related motor and cognitive impairment for neurorehabilitation 94%
- A BCI-based vibrotactile neurofeedback training improves motor cortical excitability during motor imagery 93%
- Effects of targeted assistance and perturbations on the relationship between pelvis motion and step width in people with chronic stroke 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.