Back

Competing endogenous RNA networks reveal long non-coding RNAs as potential prognostic biomarkers in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Salehi-Mazandarani, S.; Donyavi, M. H.; Vedaei, A.; Najimi, A.; Farajzadegan, Z.; Nikpour, P.

2023-04-24 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.04.22.23288939 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsGastric cancer (GC) represents a global health-care challenge. In recent years, a large number of competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network studies have elucidated critical long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as potential prognostic biomarkers in GC. Nevertheless, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis regarding them. Here, we propose a systematic review and meta-analysis for lncRNAs as prognostic biomarkers based on the ceRNA network studies in GC. Main methodsThe Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest and Google Scholar databases were searched to collect eligible ceRNA network studies in which lncRNAs were reported as prognostic biomarkers until 27th June 2022. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were assessed to evaluate the prognostic effect of the lncRNAs. Prognostic values of highly reported lncRNAs were also examined. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were evaluated. Key findingsTotally, 35 studies were included in the systematic review among which 13 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Pooled examination of HRs based on the univariate and multivariate reports revealed that the expression changes of the lncRNAs correlate with overall survival (OS) of GC patients. Two lncRNAs including CCDC144NL-AS1 and LINC01094 were highly reported as potential prognostic biomarkers based on the ceRNA network studies. Prognostic value of these two lncRNAs was furthermore confirmed by meta-analysis. SignificanceOur meta-analysis demonstrated potential application of lncRNAs introduced based on the ceRNA network studies as promising prognostic biomarkers in GC. Further functional studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying these lncRNAs functions in GC.

Published in Advanced Biomedical Research · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.