Back

COVID-19 testing avoidance among patients with cardiovascular disease

Matsumura, K.; Tabuchi, T.; Yagi, E.; Ijichi, T.; Hasegawa, M.; Yamada, N.; Funauchi, Y.; Kakehi, K.; Kawamura, T.; Nakazawa, G.

2023-04-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.04.17.23288710 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRapid coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) testing in symptomatic cases is extremely important for preventing the spread of COVID-19 infection and early therapeutic intervention. In contrast, whether symptomatic patients are tested depends largely on their health literacy, interpretation, and knowledge of COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the rate of COVID-19 testing avoidance despite having common cold symptoms in patients with cardiovascular disease and examine factors related to testing avoidance. MethodsA large-scale epidemiological questionnaire survey, the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey 2022 (JACSIS), was conducted online from April to May 2022. The rate of COVID-19 testing avoidance was investigated in patients aged 20 to 80 years with cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes) or a history of cardiovascular disease (angina, myocardial infarction, or stroke), only those exhibiting common cold symptoms during the 2 months in the survey. ResultsOf the 1,565 eligible patients, 58% (909 patients) did not undergo COVID-19 testing. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, obesity, non-walking regularly, long sedentary time, eating alone, frequent snacking, and having received 4 COVID-19 vaccinations were independently associated with testing avoidance. ConclusionsIn the chronic phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, prompt COVID-19 testing at the time of symptomatic disease is important, and strategies to reduce testing hesitancy should be considered.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.