Back

Prevention of cyclical resurgences of COVID-19-like pandemics in the long term: What are the trade-offs?

Nakamoto, I.

2023-04-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.04.16.23288641 medRxiv
Show abstract

Vaccines have facilitated the substantial reduction and containment of COVID-19 transmission in many countries by early 2023. However, the long-term interconnection between vaccines, traits of the pathogen, vaccination strategies, and cases averted/trade-offs of health outcomes is not well understood. Utilizing a compartment-calibrated model, I estimated the aversion/trade-offs effect on six major disease burdens (i.e., total/symptomatic/asymptomatic/hospitalized/ICU/death cases averted) over time conditional on a variety level of scenarios. The findings implied that low-risk immunity profiles of booster doses increased the peak cases averted versus medium- and high-risk counterparts. The effect was most salient for the former paired with enhancing the rollout rate of doses, followed by the medium- and then high-risk scenarios. Positive and temporarily durable aversion effects for the low-risk, in contrast, negative trade-offs and decreasing aversion effects for the suboptimal scenarios were observed. While there are heterogeneities in vaccines, public strategies, social efforts, and other considerations, this work can provide an evidence-based rationale for the long-term trade-off analysis of vaccination.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.