Deep Learning using Susceptibility-Weighted MR Sequence to Detect Microbleeds and Classify Cerebral Small Vessel Disease
Wu, R.; Liu, H.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Wei, L.; Huang, X.; Liu, X.; Men, X.; Li, X.; Han, L.; Lu, Z.; Qin, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundMicrobleeds (CMBs) serve as neuroimaging biomarkers to assess risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and diagnose cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). Therefore, detecting CMBs can evaluate the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and use its presence to support CSVD classification, both are conducive to optimizing CSVD management. This study aimed to develop and test a deep learning (DL) model based on susceptibility-weighted MR sequence (SWS) to detect CMBs and classify CSVD to assist neurologists in optimizing CSVD management. MethodsPatients with arteriolosclerosis (aSVD), cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), and cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) treated at three centers were enrolled between January 2017 and May 2022 in this retrospective study. The SWSs of patients from two centers were used as the development set, and the SWSs of patients from the remaining center were used as the external test set. The DL model contains a Mask R-CNN for detecting CMBs and a multi-instance learning (MIL) network for classifying CSVD. The metrics for model performance included intersection over union (IoU), Dice score, recall, confusion matrices, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, accuracy, precision, and F1-score. ResultsA total of 364 SWS were recruited, including 336 in the development set and 28 in the external test set. IoU for the model was 0.523 {+/-} 0.319, Dice score 0.627 {+/-} 0.296, and recall 0.706 {+/-} 0.365 for CMBs detection in the external test set. For CSVD classification, the model achieved a weighted-average AUC of 0.908 (95% CI: 0.895-0.921), accuracy of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.768-0.870), weighted-average precision of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.831-0.897), and weighted-average F1-score of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.782-0.876) in the external set, outperforming the performance of the neurologist group. ConclusionThe DL model based on SWS can detect CMBs and classify CSVD, thereby assisting neurologists in optimizing CSVD management.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Identification of Thrombectomy Amenable Vessel Occlusion on Computed Tomography Angiography using Deep Learning 94%
- End to end stroke triage using cerebrovascular morphology and machine learning 93%
- Left Hemisphere Bias of NIH Stroke Scale is Most Severe for Middle Cerebral Artery Strokes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Future Promises, Perils, and Practicalities 92%
- A machine learning-based holistic approach for the diagnosis of patients suffering from different conditions within the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum 89%
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scaling behaviors of deep learning and linear algorithms for the prediction of stroke severity 93%
- Machine learning-based prediction of motor status in glioma patients using diffusion MRI metrics along the corticospinal tract 92%
- The sequence of regional structural disconnectivity due to multiple sclerosis lesions 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.