Back

Impact of intestinal dysbiosis on clinical course in severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter prospective observational study

Oami, T.; Ishida, S.; Oshima, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Nakada, T.-a.

2023-03-31 gastroenterology
10.1101/2023.03.30.23287938 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDysbiosis, an imbalance of the intestinal microbiota in critically ill patients, reportedly contributes to poor outcomes. Controlling the disruption of intestinal homeostasis could be promising tactics for infectious complications in acute pancreatitis. To improve the mortality rate of severe acute pancreatitis with high frequency of infectious complications, it is warranted to elucidate the pathophysiology for development of new treatment strategies. We hypothesized that patients with severe acute pancreatitis would demonstrate gut dysbiosis, leading to an onset of infectious complications and poor outcomes. MethodsWe will conduct a prospective study to compare the sequential changes in intestinal microbiota using 16s RNA metagenomics and metabolomics between patients with severe acute pancreatitis and mild acute pancreatitis. We will enroll adult patients (18 years of age or older) diagnosed with acute pancreatitis and newly admitted to the hospitals for 48 hours or longer. We will exclude patients with inflammatory bowel disease, patients with diarrhea prior to admission, patients who have received antimicrobial agents for more than 1 week in the 2 months prior to admission. We will collect stool and blood samples on day 1 and 6. The primary outcome is changes in various parameters of the intestinal microbiota, protein concentration in stool, and metabolite concentration. The secondary outcomes include relationship between each parameter and short- and long-term prognosis, correlation of each parameter with treatment details and clinical course during ICU stay, and associations among the amount of diarrhea and alpha-diversity parameters, protein concentration in each stool, and metabolite concentration.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.8%
2
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
5
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
7
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.2%
9
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
17
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
19
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%