Back

Understanding dynamics of respiration amongst sexes: who breathe more efficiently?

Desai, D.; Dave, P.; Verma, A.; Mahajan, N.

2023-03-29 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2023.03.28.23287803 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionRespiration is a complex phenomenon requiring diaphragm, inter-costal muscles and other supporting structures. Contemplating the anatomical & physiological differences between males and females, it is essential to know how the respiratory system works in both of them. No such other study has been conducted in an Indian setup, which guided us to take up this topic. MethodologyTotal of N= 216 (Males 63, Females- 153) student were enrolled. All the participants were between the age of 17-19. Their data of Tidal volume, inspiratory reserve volume, expiratory reserve volume, maximum expiratory pressure and their vital capacity both sitting and standing were gathered and analysee. ResultsTidal volume was in males 553{+/-}56 ml and 666{+/-}60 in females(p-value = 0.031). IRV was in males 2103{+/-}139 ml and 1717{+/-}99 in females(p-value>0.0001). ERV was in males 1638{+/-}113 ml and 1323{+/-}65 in females (p-value>0.0001). VC Standing was in males 3947{+/-}155 ml and 3278{+/-}105 in females(p-value>0.0001). VC sitting was in males 3492{+/-}151 ml and 2743{+/-}107 in females(pvalue>0.0001). MEP was in males 90{+/-}8 mmHg and 64{+/-}6 mmHg in females(p-value>0.0001). Range of Pearson correlation coefficient for all=(+0.2)-(-0.2). ConclusionTidal volume was found to be higher in females than in males. Vital capacity was higher in males than in females by 700 ml in both position and vital capacity was higher by 500ml in standing than in sitting in both males and females. Body mass index weakly correlatable positively or negatively with all parameters. MEP was found to be higher in males but was weakly correlated negatively with BMI.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
27.3%
2
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
3
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
4
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
7
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
9
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
11
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
17
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
21
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%