Back

Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and at high risk of hospitalization: Systematic review and meta-analyses of observational studies

Souza, K. M.; Carrasco, G.; Rojas-Cortes, R.; Michel Barbosa, M.; Bambirra, E. H. F.; Castro, J. L.; Alvares-Teodoro, J.

2023-03-29 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.03.27.23287621 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in the treatment of outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at higher risk of developing severe illness, through a systematic review with meta-analyses of observational studies. MethodsA systematic search was performed, in accordance with the Cochrane search methods, to identify observational studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes of mortality and hospitalization were analyzed. Search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently screened references, selected the studies, extracted the data, assessed the risk of bias using ROBINS-I tool and evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE tool. This study followed the PRISMA reporting guideline. ResultsA total of 16 observational studies and 1,482,923 patients were finally included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in comparison to standard treatment without antivirals, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir reduced the risk of death by 62% (OR= 0.38; 95% CI: 0.30-0.46; moderate certainty of evidence). In addition, a 53% reduction in the risk of hospital admission was observed (OR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.36-0.60, with very low certainty of evidence). For the composite outcome of hospitalization and/or mortality, there was a 56% risk reduction (OR=0.44; 95% CI: 0.31-0.64, moderate certainty of evidence). ConclusionThe results suggest that nirmatrelvir-ritonavir could be effective in reducing mortality and hospitalization. The results were valid in vaccinated or unvaccinated high-risk individuals with COVID-19. Data from ongoing and future trials may further advance our understanding of the effectiveness and safety of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and help improve treatment guidelines for COVID-19.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.2%
3
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
4
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
7
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
10
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
27
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%