Dietary and metabolic factors contributing to Barrett's esophagus: a univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization study
Li, Z.; Zhuang, W.; Wu, J.; Xu, H.; Tang, Y.; Qiao, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundDietary and metabolic factors have been associated with the risk of Barretts esophagus (BE) in observational epidemiological studies. However, the aforementioned associations may be influenced by confounding bias. The present study aimed to evaluate these causal relationships through univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. MethodsGenetic instruments associated with dietary and metabolic factors were obtained in the large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS), respectively. Summary data for BE were available from a GWAS of 13,358 cases and 43,071 controls of European descent. Univariable MR analysis was initially performed to estimate the causal relationship between exposures and BE. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was adopted as the primary MR analysis. Multivariate MR analysis was further conducted to evaluate the independent effects of exposures on BE. ResultsIn univariate MR analysis, BE was causally associated with higher body mass index (odds ratio (OR) = 2.575, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.301-2.880, P = 7.369E-61), larger waist circumference (OR = 2.028, 95% CI: 1.648-2.496, P = 2.482E-11), and smoking per day (OR = 1.241, 95% CI: 1.085-1.419, P = 0.002). Dried fruit intake showed a protective effect on BE (OR = 0.228, 95% CI: 0.135-0.384, P = 2.783E-08), whereas alcohol drinking, coffee intake, tea intake, fresh fruit intake, and type 2 diabetes mellitus were not associated with BE (P = 0.351, P = 0.458, P = 0.125, P = 0.847, P = 0.413, respectively). No pleiotropy was found in the sensitivity analysis. The relationships of obesity, smoking, and dried fruit intake with BE risk remained strong after adjustment. ConclusionsOur study provided MR evidence supporting obesity and smoking were independent risk factors for BE. Conversely, dried fruit intake was a protective factor for BE.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating Metabolites May Illustrate Relationship of Alcohol Consumption with Cardiovascular Disease 93%
- Exploring health in the UK Biobank: associations with sociodemographic characteristics, psychosocial factors, lifestyle and environmental exposures 92%
- Adiposity, metabolites, and colorectal cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Red meat intake interacts with a TGF-β-pathway-based polygenic risk score to impact colorectal cancer risk: Application of a novel approach for polygenic risk score construction. 94%
- Smoking methylation marks for prediction of urothelial cancer risk 91%
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time-dependent relationship between urinary biomarkers of nucleic acid oxidation and colorectal cancer risk 92%
- Novel biomarkers of habitual alcohol intake and associations with risk of pancreatic and liver cancers and liver disease mortality 90%
- Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Possible roles of phytochemicals with bioactive properties in the prevention of and recovery from COVID-19 92%
- The Biochemical Effects of Carotenoids in Orange Carrots on the Colonic Proteome in a Mouse Model of Diet-induced Obesity 91%
- Effects of One-week Intake of Different Edible Oils on the Urinary Proteome of Rats 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.