Defining drivers of under-immunisation and vaccine hesitancy in refugee and migrant populations globally to support strategies to strengthen vaccine uptake for COVID-19: a rapid review
Deal, A.; Crawshaw, A. F.; Carter, J.; Knights, F.; Iwami, M.; Darwish, M.; Hossain, R.; Immordino, P.; Kaojaroen, K.; Severoni, S.; Hargreaves, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundSome refugee and migrant populations have been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, yet evidence suggests lower uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. They are also an under-immunised group for many routine vaccines. We did a rapid review to explore drivers of under-immunisation and vaccine hesitancy among refugee and migrant populations globally to define strategies to strengthen both COVID-19 and routine vaccination uptake. MethodsWe collected global literature (01/01/2010 - 05/05/2022) pertaining to drivers of under-immunisation and vaccine hesitancy in refugees and migrants, incorporating all vaccines. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health PsycINFO and the WHOs Global Research on COVID-19 database and grey literature. Qualitative data were analysed thematically to identify drivers of under-immunisation and vaccine hesitancy, then categorised using the Increasing Vaccination Model. Results63 papers were included in this review, reporting data on diverse population groups, including refugees, asylum seekers, labour and undocumented migrants from 22 countries, with six papers reporting on a regional or global scale. Drivers of under-immunisation and vaccine hesitancy pertaining to a wide range of vaccines were covered, including COVID-19 (n=27), HPV (13), measles or MMR (3), influenza (3), tetanus (1), and vaccination in general. We found a range of factors driving under-immunisation and hesitancy in refugee and migrant groups, including unique awareness and access factors that need to be better considered in policy and service delivery. Acceptability of vaccination was often deeply rooted in social and historical context and influenced by personal risk perception. ConclusionsThese findings hold direct relevance to current efforts to ensure high levels of global immunisation coverage, key to which is to ensure marginalised refugees and migrant populations are included in national vaccination plans of low-middle- and high-income countries. We found a stark lack of research from low- and middle-income and humanitarian contexts on vaccination in mobile groups, a situation that needs to be urgently rectified to ensure high coverage for COVID-19 and routine vaccinations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine brand hesitancy and other challenges to vaccination in the Philippines 96%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and conspiracy beliefs in Togo: Findings from two cross-sectional surveys 95%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 in older Syrian refugees in Lebanon: findings from a multi-wave study 95%
- A “step too far” or “perfect sense”? A qualitative study of British adults’ views on mandating COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine passports 95%
- Systematic review of pro-equity strategies to improve vaccination among priority populations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in diverse groups in the UK - is the driver economic or cultural in student populations? 95%
- Essential Workers’ COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Misinformation and Informational Needs in the Republic of North Macedonia 95%
- Social patterning and stability of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in Scotland: Will those most at risk accept a vaccine? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptability Among Refugees and Other Migrant Populations: A Systematic Scoping Review 97%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Marginalized Populations in the U.S. and Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review 96%
- COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: a mixed-methods study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications in Australia 96%
- “ We don’t routinely check vaccination background in adults” : A national qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to vaccine delivery and uptake in adult migrants through UK primary care 96%
- Community Engagement to support COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: A living systematic review protocol 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.