Back

Assignment of the somatic A/B compartments to chromatin domains in giant transcriptionally active lampbrush chromosomes

Krasikova, A.; Kulikova, T.; Rodriguez Ramos, J. S.; Maslova, A.

2023-03-15 genomics
10.1101/2023.03.14.532542 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The three-dimensional configuration of the eukaryotic genome is an emerging area of research. Chromosome conformation capture outlined genome segregation into large scale A and B compartments corresponding mainly to transcriptionally active and repressive chromatin. It remains unknown how the compartmentalization of the genome changes in growing oocytes of animals with hypertranscriptional type of oogenesis. In this type of oogenesis, highly elongated chromosomes, called lampbrush chromosomes, acquire a characteristic chromomere-loop appearance, representing one of the classical model systems for studying the structural and functional organization of chromatin domains. Here, we compared the distribution of A/B compartments in chicken somatic cells with chromatin domains in lampbrush chromosomes. We found that in lampbrush chromosomes, the extended chromatin domains, restricted by compartment boundaries in somatic cells, disintegrate into individual chromomeres. Next, we performed FISH-mapping of the genomic loci, which belong to A or B chromatin compartments as well as to A/B compartment transition regions in embryonic fibroblasts on isolated lampbrush chromosomes. We established, that in chicken lampbrush chromosomes, clusters of dense compact chromomeres bearing short lateral loops and enriched with repressive epigenetic modifications generally correspond to constitutive B compartments in somatic cells. These results suggest that gene-poor regions tend to be packed into chromomeres. Clusters of small loose chromomeres with relatively long lateral loops show no obvious correspondence with either A or B compartment identity. Some genes belonging to facultative B (sub-) compartments can be tissue-specifically transcribed during oogenesis, forming distinct lateral loops.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chromosome Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
4
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.0%
12
Chromosoma
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
15
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
19
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
20
Nucleus
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
22
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
23
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
24
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
28
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%