Back

Deep physico-chemical characterization of individual serum antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 RBD using a dual titration microspot assay

Kovacs, A.; Herincs, Z.; Papp, K.; Kaczmarek, J. Z.; Larsen, D. N.; Stage, P.; Bereczki, L.; Ujhelyi, E.; Pfeil, T.; Prechl, J.

2023-03-14 immunology
10.1101/2023.03.14.532012 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antigen specific humoral immunity can be characterized by the analysis of serum antibodies. While serological assays for the measurement of specific antibody levels are available, these are not quantitative in the biochemical sense. Yet, understanding humoral immune responses quantitatively on the systemic level would need a universal, complete, quantitative, comparable measurement method of antigen specific serum antibodies of selected immunoglobulin classes. Here we describe a fluorescent, dual-titration immunoassay, which provides the physico-chemical parameters that are both necessary and sufficient to quantitatively characterize the humoral immune response. We define the theory of the approach that is based on physical chemistry. For validation of theory, we used recombinant receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 as antigen on microspot arrays and varied the concentration of both the antigen and serum antibodies from infected persons to obtain a measurement matrix of binding data. Both titration curves were simultaneously fitted using an algorithm based on the generalized logistic function and adapted for analyzing thermodynamic variables of binding. We obtained equilibrium affinity constants and chemical potentials for distinct antibody classes. These variables reflect the quality and the effective quantity of serum antibodies, respectively. The proposed fluorescent dual-titration microspot immunoassay can generate truly quantitative serological data that is suitable for immunological, medical and systems biological analysis.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.