Back

Electronic-Based Health Promotion Models On The Use Of Post Placental Iud Birth Control A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis

Sulistiyanto, H.; Soetrisno, S.; Subiyanto, A. A.

2023-03-13 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2023.03.12.23286202 medRxiv
Show abstract

Low levels of IUD use, especially post-placental IUDs, are associated with bias and lack of information because contraceptive counseling is limited, for example, through conversations with doctors, written materials, or audiovisual techniques. This study aimed to identify electronic (video) interventions using post-placental IUD contraception through systematic review and meta-analysis. Based on those keywords, some results were obtained: 509 from Google Scholar, 33 from PubMed, 14 from Science Direct, 88 from Sage Journal, 50 from Springer Links, 20 from Scopus, and 178 from ProQuest. In addition, the recording was carried out on the bibliography of review articles, 12 articles were obtained for systematic review, and five meta-analyses were carried out. The heterogeneity test shows a value {rho} greater than 0.05, which is {rho} =0.88 with I2 = 0%, meaning that the variation between studies is homogeneous. The Random Effects Model yielded a pooled odds ratio of 1.07 (95& CI 0.26-4.39). The value {rho} = 0.93 so that there was no difference between the treatment and control groups, and the data were homogeneous, an odd ratio of 1.07 was obtained, it was found that video use could increase 1.07 times the knowledge, skills, and decision-making of using post placental IUD compared to those who did not use video.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.