Mpox vaccine and infection-driven human immune signatures
Cohn, H.; Cai, G.; Bloom, N.; Clark, J.; Tarke, A.; Bermudez-Gonzalez, M. C.; Altman, D.; Lugo, L. A.; Lobo, F. P.; Marquez, S.; study group, P.; Chen, J.-Q.; Ren, W.; Qin, L.; Crotty, S.; Krammer, F.; Grifoni, A.; Sette, A.; Simon, V.; Coelho, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundMpox (formerly known as monkeypox) outbreaks outside endemic areas peaked in July 2022, infecting > 85,000 people and raising concerns about our preparedness against this emerging viral pathogen. Licensed and approved for mpox, the JYNNEOS vaccine has fewer side effects than previous smallpox vaccines and demonstrated efficacy against mpox infection in humans. Comparing JYNNEOS vaccine- and mpox-induced immunity is imperative to evaluate JYNNEOS immunogenicity and inform vaccine administration and design. MethodsWe examined the polyclonal serum (ELISA) and single B cell (heavy chain gene and transcriptome data) antibody repertoires and T cells (AIM and ICS assays) induced by the JYNNEOS vaccine as well as mpox infection. FindingsGene-level plasmablast and antibody responses were negligible and JYNNEOS vaccinee sera displayed minimal binding to recombinant mpox proteins and native proteins from the 2022 outbreak strain. In contrast, recent mpox infection (within 20-102 days) induced robust serum antibody responses to A29L, A35R, A33R, B18R, and A30L, and to native mpox proteins, compared to vaccinees. JYNNEOS vaccine recipients presented comparable CD4 and CD8 T cell responses against orthopox peptides to those observed after mpox infection. InterpretationJYNNEOS immunization does not elicit a robust B cell response, and its immunogenicity may be mediated by T cells. FundingResearch reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U54CA267776, U19AI168631(VS), as well as institutional funds from the Icahn School of Medicine.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunofocusing on the conserved fusion peptide of HIV envelope glycoprotein in rhesus macaques 96%
- A novel chimeric coronavirus spike vaccine combining SARS-CoV-2 RBD and scaffold domains from HKU-1 elicits potent neutralising antibody responses 96%
- One mucosal administration of a live attenuated recombinant COVID-19 vaccine protects non-human primates from SARS-CoV-2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterologous vaccination regimens with self-amplifying RNA and Adenoviral COVID vaccines induce robust immune responses in mice 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein vaccine candidate NVX-CoV2373 elicits immunogenicity in baboons and protection in mice 96%
- Breadth of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization and Protection Induced by a Nanoparticle Vaccine 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- BCR, not TCR, repertoire diversity is associated with favorable COVID-19 prognosis 96%
- Memory B cell and humoral responses elicited by Sputnik V in naïve and COVID-19-recovered vaccine recipients 96%
- Longitudinal cellular and humoral immune responses following Covid-19 BNT162b2-mRNA-based booster vaccination of craft and manual workers in Qatar. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Durability of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AZD1222) vaccination in people living with HIV - responses to SARS-CoV-2, variants of concern and circulating coronaviruses 97%
- Immunogenic epitope panel for accurate detection of non-cross-reactive T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 96%
- T cell response to intact SARS-CoV-2 includes coronavirus cross-reactive and variant-specific components 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 prime-boost vaccination elicits potent neutralizing antibody responses and T cell reactivity 97%
- Dynamics of humoral and cellular immune responses after homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 97%
- The ChAdOx1 vectored vaccine, AZD2816, induces strong immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 Beta (B.1.351) and other variants of concern in preclinical studies. 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.