Modelling the association between neutralizing antibody levels and SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics : implications to define correlates of protection against infection
Lingas, G.; Planas, D.; Pere, H.; Duffy, D.; Staropoli, I.; Porrot, F.; Guivel-Benhassine, F.; Chapuis, N.; Gobeaux, C.; Veyer, D.; Delaugerre, C.; Le Goff, J.; Getten, P.; Hadjadj, J.; Bellino, A.; Parfait, B.; Treluyer, J.-M.; Schwartz, O.; Guedj, J.; Kerneis, S.; Terrier, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundWhile anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody kinetics have been well described in large populations of vaccinated individuals, we still poorly understand how they evolve during a natural infection and how this impacts viral clearance. MethodsFor that purpose, we analyzed the kinetics of both viral load and neutralizing antibody levels in a prospective cohort of individuals during acute infection by Alpha variant. ResultsUsing a mathematical model, we show that the progressive increase in neutralizing antibodies leads to a shortening of the half-life of both infected cells and infectious viral particles. We estimated that the neutralizing activity reached 90% of its maximal level within 8 days after symptoms onset and could reduce the half-life of both infected cells and infectious virus by a 6-fold factor, thus playing a key role to achieve rapid viral clearance. Using this model, we conducted a simulation study to predict in a more general context the protection conferred by the existence of pre-existing neutralization, due to either vaccination or prior infection. We predicted that a neutralizing activity, as measured by ED50 >103, could reduce by 50% the risk of having viral load detectable by standard PCR assays and by 99% the risk of having viral load above the threshold of cultivable virus. ConclusionsThis threshold value for the neutralizing activity could be used to identify individuals with poor protection against disease acquisition.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The spread of SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron with the doubling time of 2.0–3.3 days can be explained by immune evasion 94%
- Function is more reliable than quantity to follow up the humoral response to the Receptor Binding Domain of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein after natural infection or COVID-19 vaccination 93%
- Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 VOC neutralization and novel mAb reveal protection against Omicron 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergence of transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants with decreased sensitivity to antivirals in immunocompromised patients with persistent infections 95%
- Resistance of Omicron subvariants BA.2.75.2, BA.4.6 and BQ.1.1 to neutralizing antibodies 95%
- Neutralization of ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and variants Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Zeta and Omicron by mRNA vaccination and infection-derived immunity through homologous and heterologous variants 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic consequences of effective and suboptimal dosing with mutagenic drugs in a hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
- Cell type-specific adaptation of the SARS-CoV-2 spike 95%
- Evolution of a globally unique SARS-CoV-2 Spike E484T monoclonal antibody escape mutation in a persistently infected, immunocompromised individual 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fusogenicity and neutralization sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta sublineage AY.4.2 96%
- Dynamics of humoral and cellular immune responses after homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5: Evolving tropism and evasion of potent humoral responses and resistance to clinical immunotherapeutics relative to viral variants of concern 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.