Back

Quality of Drug Prescription and Dispensing Practices in a Teaching Hospital in a developing country

Ogaji, D. S.; OWHONDAH, K. S.; Zorte, Z.

2023-03-07 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2023.03.03.23286781 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe World Health Organization recommends rational drug usage to protect patient health and quality of life. Study assessed the quality of drug prescription and dispensing in a tertiary hospital. MethodsCross-sectional study with retrospective and prospective data collection underpinned by the WHO core prescribing indicators. A cluster sample of 10 clinical units and their attached pharmacies in the hospital. Six hundred prescriptions from the pharmacy over six months were randomly selected to evaluate the prescription indicators, 330 patient encounters observed for patient care indicators, and 48 randomly selected doctors to evaluate factors influencing their prescribing practices across the 10 clinics. Descriptive analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 and comparison done across all indicators of rational drug use. ResultsAverage drugs per encounter was 3.4 {+/-} 1.9 drugs. Antibiotics and injections were prescribed in 40.2% and 24.8% encounters respectively. Generic names were used in 43.6% and 97.1% of prescription were from the essential medicine list. Average time for consultation was 17.5 {+/-} 8.0 minutes, dispensing time was 7.7 {+/-} 3.8 minutes, 99.8% of medications were properly labelled, and 82% of patients understood the drug doses. The pharmacies stocked 93.3% of key drugs but no consultation room had the essential drug list. Only 43.7% of physicians demonstrated accurate understanding of rational drug use. ConclusionFindings on the WHO core drug indicators showed poor quality of drug prescription. Brand prescription, polypharmacy, and antibiotic overuse observed requires intensifying training and monitoring on rational drug use.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
2
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.2%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.7%
5
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
8
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
13
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Pan African Medical Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
24
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%