Back

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the etiology and characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia among children requiring bronchoalveolar lavage in northern China

Liu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Shen, C.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Q.; Hou, T.; Niu, F.; Kong, Q.; Ning, J.; Yang, L.

2023-03-05 pediatrics
10.1101/2023.03.02.23286686 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTo investigate the etiology and clinical characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among children requiring bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and analyze the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the pathogen spectrum and clinical manifestations. MethodsChildren <14 years old hospitalized with CAP requiring BLA were enrolled between February 2019 to January 2020 and August 2021 to July 2022. Multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR) was used for pathogen detection. The demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between different pathogen-type infection groups, and before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. ResultsPathogen was detected in 91.66% (1363/1487) children. Mycoplasma pneumoniae, adenovirus and human rhinovirus were the most frequently detected pathogens. The frequency of detection of virus infections and co-infections was decreased during the pandemic, but the detection of atypical bacterial infections was increased. The clinical manifestations and the results of CT scans and fiberoptic bronchoscopy showed a significant difference between different types of pathogen infection, and lung inflammation was reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the pandemic. ConclusionsM. pneumoniae infection might be the greatest pediatric disease burden leading to CAP in northern China. Wearing masks and social distancing in public places during the COVID-19 pandemic effectively reduced the transmission of respiratory viruses, but it did not reduce the infection rate of M. pneumoniae. In addition, these interventions significantly reduced lung inflammation in children compared with before the pandemic.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.3%
2
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
5
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
6
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
7
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
10
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
11
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
12
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%